Our Mission

Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 Research resource logo

Navigation

Popular content

Recent comments


this was sitemeter

9/11 Researchers

Fred's blog

Shill William Seger and JREF Conclude Taylor and Hezarkhani 9/11 Shots Impossible: Ferry View Blocked By Huge Trees

Some truth for Fred.
Submitted by WilliamSeger on Thu, 2007-11-01 08:49.

It's completely impossible that you don't know full well that this is the shot that EeneyMinnieMoe got that most closely matches the Hezarkhani and Taylor viewpoints, within a few feet in fact, not the one that you dishonestly claimed was the "best shot":

2 minute JREF Video Debunks WillamSeger 9/11 Claims

JREF Debunks Spoon-Bending 9/11 Video Fraud Hoaxers Hezarkhani and Carmen Taylor: WilliamSeger Manipulation Attempts Backfire

Honest members of the James Randi Educational Forum aka JREF are being played for fools by slick huckster William Seger, who posts under the name Wseger or WilliamSeger. William Seger is attempting to defend fake September 11, 2001 hoax videos and photos of a plane crashing into the World Trade Center.

This image from the CNN Ghostplane video cannot be taken anywhere on earth:

William Seger Scores Goal Against Own Team: Provides Photographic Proof of CNN fraud and Carmen Taylor hoax

Idiot of the year award goes to William Seger for posting a screenshot from Microsoft Virtual Earth that is MISSING 19 RECTOR STREET.

This same database was used for the fake CNN video, and the same glitch is evident in the CNN fake. [credit for that discovery goes to Makka Pakka who first posted it over on 911movement.org.]

See the beige building IN FRONT OF THE DB BUILDING? That's 19 RECTOR STREET aka Greenwich Club Residences

Free technical consulting from John Gault, Coffinman, and Gerard Holmgren

Got a PhD? Highly sought after work experience? Advanced degrees? Well, now you can work for free for any fool who calls you up. Just answer an email or a post from Coffinman, Gerard Holmgren, or John Gault. They think they're your bosses and you have to answer their questions. What will they pay you? Nothing. What work do they do? Your guess is as good as mine. What analysis have they already done? Who knows? I sure don't. Why should you answer their questions? I have no idea. They think they're important.

Killtown's Blog Pages

Hi Rick,

Did you just delete Killtown's blog page to make it look like he only made the 3 posts you grouped togeteher with my "Attack your friends~!" topic?

Killtown is telling me that he made about 20 or more on-topic 9/11 posts here and if you deleted his blog that looks kind of sleazy. I hope that's not what just happened.

Say it ain't so.

Fred

http://www.911researchers.com/blog/20

Coffinman's blog postings reveal his intentions

I can't find much 9/11 info in them, mostly attacks. I wonder why.

See for yourself. What can you learn about 9/11 from reading this blog? ALMOST NOTHING

http://www.911researchers.com/blog/59

I'm open to the idea that Coffinman is merely defending himself, but I don't think his postings reflect that.

This Is Gerard Holmgren's Site There's No Research Here

Gerard Holmgren's blog
They'd rather be embarrassed than comply

As if webgirls and robots with furry teeth didn;t dothe job.

* Add new comment
* 8 reads

They having a tantie about this

And yet,they could end it, simply by getting Ace and Webfairy to comply. Send them mail.

* 1 comment
* 27 reads

And yet

They have enormous problems with just taking down the work of someone they despise

* 1 comment
* 29 reads

And robots with furry teeth

All good research

* Add new comment
* 4 reads


They never had a problem with Porn spam

Webgirls gone wild and all that. That was OK it seems.

* Add new comment
* 3 reads

They'd rather have a spam battle


Than take down work thatthey don't take any notice of anyway.

* 1 comment
* 15 reads

Dones this answeryour question Ace ?


When WF takes down mywork and Ace removes the archivelinks,this will stop.

* 4 comments
* 35 reads

Dear oh dear...

Arethey tryingto make a point ? Why don;tthey just take it down ?

* 1 comment
* 14 reads

Having a little tantie, Fred ?

I thought that belonged over at the forum. Never mind,just tell Ace and WF that you want the site back

* 1 comment
* 13 reads

Wow

They must really like my work to put up with this.
Gerard Holmgren's blog
Webfairy must take down all of my work.

Webfairy must take down all of my work.

* Add new comment

* 4 reads

When Webfairy takes down my work...

I'll be gone. For good. Don't you want that ?

Is there something dreadfully,dreadfully important about staying assoociated with my work.

Now I'm upfront about why I don;t want to be associated with any of this crap.

The Griffinization or if you like,Fetzerization of no planes for a start.

What Fred hasn't been so upfront about is why Webfairy is so desperately keen to hang on to my work and why she keeps hiding behind bodyguards.

Why not just ditch my work ? You don't need it do you ?


You have everything you need without me ?

* 1 comment
* 8 reads

It's an angry little truthling

Posting my phone number...

Shaking in my shoes...

Why don't you just tell Webfairy to take down my work ?

But I notice that angry Fred referred to me as "no plane Gerard Holmgren"

You believe in planes, Fred ?

Just not Big Boeings ?

* 1 comment

* 11 reads

It's fascinating

That they should be so desperate for Wefairy -the Fetzer fan - tobe able to keepposting my material, that they'd rather put up with my spamming than give in.

I guess my work must be important to the "planes both did and did not hit the towers" scam that Fetzer and Webfairy are cooking up.


KT was the only one who made the sensible response - paraphrased- as in "Webfairy , just take it down,so that we're rid of him."

That's what I'd think too in his situation.

So what's causing Fred's little tantie ?

* 1 comment
* Read more
* 29 reads

Duh!

I'm the copyright owner.

"Reproduced without permission does not mean the same thing as reproduced in defiance of specific prohibition.

In any case, none of you gave a shit about the other notices that quite expressly
prohibited unauthorized reproduction.

"Tough" was the response.

In any case, the legalities aside, you'll be rid of me once Webfairy takese everything of mine down.

Ifyou don't like it - "tough".

* 1 comment
* 26 reads

Lies and doublethink

In the name of "no planes" is no more acceptable than it is in the name of "demolition" or "inside job."

* 3 comments
* 41 reads

Webfairy must remove...

all of my work from her site

* 1 comment
* 22 reads

I wont wait much longer

If I don't get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it.


* 4 comments
* 76 reads

What's the point ?

Are you guys just displaying ego in showing that you wont be pushed around ?

If you spit in someone's face,they might just spit back.

Tough.

* Add new comment
* 15 reads


They'd rather be embarrassed than comply

As if webgirls and robots with furry teeth didn't dothe job.

* Add new comment
* 12 reads
Gerard Holmgren's blog
I wont wait much longer

If I don't get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But
someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it.

* Add new comment
* 15 reads

Why the resistance ?

You can have your "research" site back any time you like.

Don't tell methat this is a matter of "principle".

Principles - from you lot ?

Don't make me laugh.

* Add new comment
* 10 reads

It's not open to negotiation

Ace Baker takes down the archive links and Webfairy takes down the rest of my work, and then I get out of here and let you get on with your lying and doublethinking.

* Add new comment
* 5 reads

Ace Baker effectively recreated my website

It's ultimately my responsiblity to erasethe archives, but until then it is Ace's responsibility to undo what he did.

I don't care whether you agree or not. This is what happens until you do it.

* Add new comment
* 6 reads

We could be here all year...

Is that what you want ?

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

What's the point ?

Are you guys just displaying ego in showing that you wont be pushed around ?

If you spit in someone's face,they might just spit back.

Tough.

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

I wont wait much longer

If I don;t get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it !

* Add new comment
* 6 reads


It's not open to negotiation

Ave Bker takes down the archive links and Webfairy takes down the rest of my work, and then I get out of here and let you get on with your lying and doublethinking.

* Add new comment
* 6 reads

Why the resistance ?

You can have yor "research" site back any time you like.


Don't tell methat this is a matter of "principle".

Principles - from you lot ?

Don't make me laugh.

* Add new comment
* 5 reads

Ace Baker effectively recreated my website

It's ultimately my responsiblity to erasethe archives, but until then it is Ace's
responsibility to undo what he did.

I don't care whether you agree or not. This is what happens until you do it.

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

This Is Gerard Holmgren's Site There's No Research Here

Gerard Holmgren's blog
They'd rather be embarrassed than comply

As if webgirls and robots with furry teeth didn;t dothe job.

* Add new comment
* 8 reads

They having a tantie about this

And yet,they could end it, simply by getting Ace and Webfairy to comply. Send them mail.

* 1 comment
* 27 reads

And yet

They have enormous problems with just taking down the work of someone they despise

* 1 comment
* 29 reads

And robots with furry teeth

All good research

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

HACKED BY GERARD HOLMGREN

Gerard Holmgren's blog
They'd rather be embarrassed than comply

As if webgirls and robots with furry teeth didn;t dothe job.

* Add new comment
* 8 reads

They having a tantie about this

And yet,they could end it, simply by getting Ace and Webfairy to comply. Send them mail.

* 1 comment
* 27 reads

And yet

They have enormous problems with just taking down the work of someone they despise

* 1 comment
* 29 reads

And robots with furry teeth

All good research

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

They never had a problem with Porn spam

Webgirls gone wild and all that. That was OK it seems.

* Add new comment
* 3 reads

They'd rather have a spam battle

Than take down work thatthey don't take any notice of anyway.

* 1 comment
* 15 reads

Dones this answeryour question Ace ?

When WF takes down mywork and Ace removes the archivelinks,this will stop.

* 4 comments
* 35 reads

Dear oh dear...

Arethey tryingto make a point ? Why don;tthey just take it down ?

* 1 comment
* 14 reads

Having a little tantie, Fred ?

I thought that belonged over at the forum. Never mind,just tell Ace and WF that you want the site back

* 1 comment
* 13 reads

Wow

They must really like my work to put up with this.
Gerard Holmgren's blog
Webfairy must take down all of my work.

Webfairy must take down all of my work.

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

When Webfairy takes down my work...

I'll be gone. For good. Don't you want that ?

Is there something dreadfully,dreadfully important about staying assoociated with my work.

Now I'm upfront about why I don;t want to be associated with any of this crap.

The Griffinization or if you like,Fetzerization of no planes for a start.

What Fred hasn't been so upfront about is why Webfairy is so desperately keen to hang on to my work and why she keeps hiding behind bodyguards.

Why not just ditch my work ? You don't need it do you ?

You have everything you need without me ?

* 1 comment
* 8 reads

It's an angry little truthling

Posting my phone number...

Shaking in my shoes...

Why don't you just tell Webfairy to take down my work ?

But I notice that angry Fred referred to me as "no plane Gerard Holmgren"

You believe in planes, Fred ?

Just not Big Boeings ?

* 1 comment
* 11 reads

It's fascinating

That they should be so desperate for Wefairy -the Fetzer fan - tobe able to keepposting my material, that they'd rather put up with my spamming than give in.

I guess my work must be important to the "planes both did and did not hit the towers" scam that Fetzer and Webfairy are cooking up.

KT was the only one who made the sensible response - paraphrased- as in "Webfairy , just take it down,so that we're rid of him."

That's what I'd think too in his situation.

So what's causing Fred's little tantie ?

* 1 comment
* Read more
* 29 reads

Duh!

I'm the copyright owner.

"Reproduced without permission does not mean the same thing as reproduced in defiance of specific prohibition.

In any case, none of you gave a shit about the other notices that quite expressly prohibited unauthorized reproduction.

"Tough" was the response.

In any case, the legalities aside, you'll be rid of me once Webfairy takese everything of mine down.

Ifyou don't like it - "tough".

* 1 comment
* 26 reads

Lies and doublethink

In the name of "no planes" is no more acceptable than it is in the name of "demolition" or "inside job."

* 3 comments
* 41 reads

Webfairy must remove...

all of my work from her site

* 1 comment
* 22 reads

I wont wait much longer

If I don't get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it.

* 4 comments
* 76 reads

What's the point ?

Are you guys just displaying ego in showing that you wont be pushed around ?

If you spit in someone's face,they might just spit back.

Tough.

* Add new comment
* 15 reads

They'd rather be embarrassed than comply

As if webgirls and robots with furry teeth didn't dothe job.

* Add new comment
* 12 reads
Gerard Holmgren's blog
I wont wait much longer

If I don't get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it.

* Add new comment
* 15 reads

Why the resistance ?

You can have your "research" site back any time you like.

Don't tell methat this is a matter of "principle".

Principles - from you lot ?

Don't make me laugh.

* Add new comment
* 10 reads

It's not open to negotiation

Ace Baker takes down the archive links and Webfairy takes down the rest of my work, and then I get out of here and let you get on with your lying and doublethinking.

* Add new comment
* 5 reads

Ace Baker effectively recreated my website

It's ultimately my responsiblity to erasethe archives, but until then it is Ace's responsibility to undo what he did.

I don't care whether you agree or not. This is what happens until you do it.

* Add new comment
* 6 reads

We could be here all year...

Is that what you want ?

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

What's the point ?

Are you guys just displaying ego in showing that you wont be pushed around ?

If you spit in someone's face,they might just spit back.

Tough.

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

I wont wait much longer

If I don;t get quick compliance ,then I will start mass mailing MSM with links to Webfairy's "Judy Wood is a robot with furry teeth" stuff.

They will love it. Think for a moment about how they'll write it up...

I've already sent it to Andrea Peyser,but it looks like she didn;tpick it up. But someone will.

Is that what you want ?

Just do it !

* Add new comment
* 6 reads

It's not open to negotiation

Ave Bker takes down the archive links and Webfairy takes down the rest of my work, and then I get out of here and let you get on with your lying and doublethinking.

* Add new comment
* 6 reads

Why the resistance ?

You can have yor "research" site back any time you like.

Don't tell methat this is a matter of "principle".

Principles - from you lot ?

Don't make me laugh.

* Add new comment
* 5 reads

Ace Baker effectively recreated my website

It's ultimately my responsiblity to erasethe archives, but until then it is Ace's responsibility to undo what he did.

I don't care whether you agree or not. This is what happens until you do it.

* Add new comment
* 4 reads

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 2 guests online.

Sponsor

User login

Subscribe

9/11 Researchers - Open Resource for 9/11 Researchers

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Web Pages referring to this page
Link to this page and get a link back!