Zionism always gets the blame doesn't it?
Well.....
Zionism is the movement to set up a Jewish state in Israel. That has been accomplished.
But underlying that is the Overall plan for World domination, which was started by Joseph:

"And Joseph gathered up all the money that was found in the land of Egypt, and in the land of Canaan, for the corn which they bought: and Joseph brought the money into Pharaoh's house.

I had to pop my head in here to post this.
After all of the lies and fruit-looping, trying to smear me here as sexist, and being backed up by that saboteur Haupt, who added to her lies, we get her openly declaring:
"Men think with their dick".
After the way he attacked me with lies because he proposed that I was sexist, can anyone guess how Haupt will react to this?
Here is the context:

[I am shocked at the extent you are just not getting this.

The idea behind the wiggly girls is to provide positive energy while people learn about very negative things.

[i actually think somebody who started all this is a perp].
-Genghis.

-["...When a man protects a woman it just about guarantees
she will not speak out against him].
-Webfairy

[I made some fundamentally bad assumptions I need to take responsibility for and I need to admit to what amounted to a smear that I kept up with even after my friends tried to warn me.]
-Webfairy

[...my hormones remark.... I have to take responsibility for it, and for the posion (sic) that coffin's interpretation added].
-Webfairy

So what did all the agents of deception that have been outed here have in common?

Well firstly they all supported Wood's UNPROVEN DEW hypothesis.
What would be the point in that?
Maybe to cover up the destruction of building by other methods?
Given the incredible things associated with those destructions it seems that the cover-up would be to disguise the fact that NUCLEAR WEAPONS WERE IN FACT USED IN NEW YORK.

Something else was the discussion of apparent black-ops vehicles.
These are pointed to in videos that we know are not untouched originals.

This is one of my very best.
An absolute gem:

To "old friends".

People are talking complete crap about physics now.
People who obviously don't have a clue.
(Although really it looks like Morgan's fatally flawed "mass hypothesis" is being V2 bodyguarded by Peggy Carter.)
It's the same bunch bodyguarding the same bunch.
Anyway....
I'm not going to get into arguments but try this:

When a bullet is fired through the window of an office block, does the bullet encounter:

a) The full mass of the whole office block
or
b) The force needed to break the window, and nothing more

Which one is it? (and etc.).

I have countered the lies made against me in an attempt to destroy my credibility by smear and I have refuted those who tried to misrepresent me.

I am no longer concerned with anything else.

If I am the subject of another smear attack, like this:
http://911researchers.com/node/758

Or if I am misrepresented again as outlined here:
http://911researchers.com/node/757

I'll be back.

And nothing has changed!

The material facts are:
1. Grable maintains unconditional support for Wood, who supports Fetzer, who promotes 911mysteries and Loose Change as "The best we have".
2. Haupt attempted to destroy my credibility AND sabotage THIS SITE repeatedly and in a number of ways in order to prevent the exposure of (1).

After weeks of vicious slander against me, Webfairy finally retracted her fraudulent accusations against me, and admitted having been in error:

[I made some fundamentally bad assumptions I need to take responsibility for and I need to admit to what amounted to a smear that I kept up with even after my friends tried to warn me.]

[...my hormones remark.... I have to take responsibility for it, and for the posion (sic) that coffin's interpretation added.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/725#comment-5604

And now she's repeating the same lies all over again:

[Even Coffinman has admitted it's un-debunkable]
http://www.911researchers.com/node/743#comment-5894
I reckoned that she had proved her case, but some people here don't.
I haven't been in the debate.
So please forgive me if I do not have a "final answer" on what I think of her work.
Yes I described her once as having "proven" DEW, but that was only my personal opinion.
(And nobody is perfect, are they??!)
If there has been no debate, then the ideas have not been tested critically.
Until her work is discussed it could be a crock of shit.