Rick Siegel spends endless time and effort attacking Sofia, who produced "9/11 Mysteries", me, who founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth, and Jerry Leaphart, who guided the "Requests for Correction" submissions to NIST, while completely ignoring the San Diego Grand Jury fiasco stage-managed by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman and the st911.org submission to NIST, which, for inexplicable reasons, has never been archived on the official government web site.

Sofia has sent me an explanation of how she proceeded in putting together
"9/11 Mysteries". I believe she did the best she could with what she had
to work with and that she has now figured out how to do it even better. I
see no basis for the kind of slams she has taken or the kind of trashing I
have received from many on this list. I think enough is enough. Enough!

Jim,

UPDATE UPDATE

THE MADISON CONFERENCE
3-5 August 2007

Scholars for 9/11 Truth will be sponsoring its first conference on
"The Science of 9/11: What's Controversial, What's Not", from 3-5
August 2007 at the Radisson Madison in Madison, WI. The purpose of
this conference is to provide an opportunity (a) to review multiple
proofs that the "official account" of 9/11 cannot possibly be true,
(b) to expore some of the issues that have generated controversy in

Rick,

I must tell you that, after reviewing the bidding on this one, I think that Sofia is in the right and you are in the wrong.

http://www.911blogger.com/node/9094#comment-147778

About truth and justice

Steve,

Just for the record, why do you continue to make statements about the journal you co-edit that are inaccurate and miseading? It was created as a part of Scholars, not as an independent entity, where Judy Wood was your original co-editor and I managinag editor. Please cease making these historically false and legally disputable claims.

I received this this evening. If it is true, it is stunning and exposes a major hoax. Jim

Click here for a pdf of this cover letter.

Dear Don Paul, and CC

Dr Steven E. Jones has surveyed his 9/11 research in his new paper entitled
"Revisiting 9/11/2001

TRANSCRIPT

On the Manipulation of the 9/11 Research Community

Jim Fetzer

Date: Sat, 19 May 2007 08:14:32 -0500 [08:14:32 CDT]
From: jfetzer@d.umn.edu
To: ......... <.........@yahoo.com>
Cc: jfetzer@d.umn.edu
Subject: Re: James Fetzer: What\'s going on?

http://67.15.255.19/~c911sch1/media/0517071.mp3
http://67.15.255.19/~c911sch1/media/0517072.mp3

Quoting Les Orr :

[Hide Quoted Text]
This is an enquiry e-mail via http://67.15.255.19/~c911sch1 from:
......... <.........@yahoo.com>

Fetzer, Jim, seriously, what is the problem? I check this sight daily from my home in

Even Steve Jones does not claim that thermite/thermate "can explain everything". My
concern is whether it can explain anything! The iron is in samples of dust, not of molten
metal, proof steel was turned to dust! If Barium Nitrate is indeed an ingredient of
military versions of thermite/themate, then why has it not been discovered in these
samples? How many "cutter charges" were needed to destroy the Twin Towers? How much of
the towers' massive pulverization can they account for? If the only patents we have