The recent CSPAN broadcast of the hearings by the Sub-committee on terror on the Internet made it clear that the government is to persue an attitude that dissent or speculation were gateways to terrorist activities. Even more frightening was the hateful rhetoric of the participants whose myopic views of freedom were limited to pontification on why freedom must be restricted for the war on the invisible and the tactic of surprise.

Perhaps it is incumbent on us Americans to understand the way of the “terrorist?” Our very nation was formed by our terrorist forefathers who hid in trees and bushes sniping the British, set up explosive traps, and sent out suicide bombers to terrorize the King’s troops who were merely trying to keep their “rule of law” alive in their own lands, the Kings land. American freedom fighters were called barbaric terrorists afraid to fight like proper military. All sounds too familiar?

Watching this CSPAN special it is clear that all governments, cult churches, ideological proponents of all types have found a level field to get information out on the Internet. The sickness only rises as the actual meeting of the US rulers was intended to lay the groundwork for prohibitions and roadblocks to freedom of information for its subjects. Once again the rulers feel they can make better decisions at understanding what information is fit for digestion than those that might peruse it. They will soon be closing sites for content. Love and hate will be defined for you and you may follow or you may be stripped of all your possessions and go to jail without trial or rights.

I was actually thinking of the lies the Bush administration used to bring Americans to send almost 4000 military to death, spend 100’s of billions of unearned dollars to fund illegal death and destruction 10,000 miles from our border. This is terror, not what these buffoons actually pointed to; dissent websites and nationalistic websites (those whose nations are under siege by foreigners trying to instigate “their” form of “rule of law” as supreme). It is only a matter of perspective as to who the terrorist is. When “people” recruit for a war against inflicted governments the definition of terrorist, traitor, freedom fighter and the like are obscured by the viewpoint. I would certainly be fighting against invading forces trying to inflict a foreign government on me and I think these people are too.

Perhaps the rulers of Americans are right as the subjects of their subjugations do nothing but vote and cheer them on to more incredible affronts to the unalienable rights we had at birth?

In fact politicians and others talk of “rule of law”, a direct reference to divine right rule and empire, rather than worry about the loss of unalienable rights guaranteed in the Constitution. People monkey the words and soon no one is talking about our unalienable rights. They are more concerned with “rule of law” something repugnant to the Constitution. The people presenting this are more terrorists spreading propaganda than those they portray.