Sort of takes a David Shayler twist into the esoteric lot.

I see a pattern in 911truth where they first took in the fictional works of Avery, then Shafquat declaring them fact until they were exposed. Now they embrace this complete fiction?

Both Shafquat and Fetzer have stated that the events must be fictionalized to tell the story, or "even if true I would not say it" respectively. For those who need to obscure the events it is important to make a fictional blend that would be plausible to carry their agenda. After seven years of doing a bad job at twisting the truth claiming it as true the 911truth movement has chosen to actually embrace a fiction, something purposely fictitious and full of fabrications to amuse. Take this fiction and use it as some launch to "it could be true." Almost like another cult who depends that your hopes for an afterlife will bind you to their subjugations.

What kind of idiot mind can embrace a fiction as proof of non-fiction? They actually gather every Sunday to kneel before a painted idol, re-enact ancient ritual body eating and blood drinking in some throwback to primitive paganism without which you cannot run for president.