Our Mission

Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 Research resource logo

Navigation

Popular content

Recent comments


this was sitemeter

9/11 Researchers

Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel

Andrew Johnson's picture
Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Sun, 2008-02-17 12:37.

(A little late posting here!!) I posted this earlier, but must have missed the "final step")

Video of 1st hour referenced below is here:

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=-1570615667754851772

Also posted on OpEdNews:

http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_andrew_j_080129_scientists_see_w...

Scientists See WTC - Hutchison Effect Parallel

14th and 18th January 2008, Washington DC, USA - In two appearances on a Washington DC Pacifica Radio Station, WPFW, on a show hosted by Author and Political Commentator Ambrose I. Lane, Sr., Dr. Judy Wood, a former Professor of Mechanical Engineering, and John Hutchison, experimental scientist, discussed how photographic and video evidence suggest that the World Trade Centre (WTC) towers were destroyed using Directed Energy Weapons (DEW). Many of the observed effects resemble those seen in John Hutchison’s experiments.

In early January 2008, Wood posted a new study on her website (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ), which relates effects seen in photographs taken before, during and after the destruction of the WTC complex, to effects seen in Hutchison’s ongoing experiments. Wood and Hutchison co-authored the study.

John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor and experimental scientist who has been working with “field effects” for almost 30 years. The Hutchison Effect is a collection of phenomena discovered accidentally by John Hutchison in 1979 during attempts to reproduce the work of Nikola Tesla. Hutchison uses radio frequency and electrostatic sources. The Hutchison Effect occurs in a volume of space where the beams intersect and interfere. The results are levitation of heavy objects, fusion of dissimilar materials such as metal and wood, anomalous melting (without heating) of metals without burning adjacent material, spontaneous fracturing of metals (which separate by sliding in a sideways fashion), and both temporary and permanent changes in the crystalline structure and physical properties of metal samples.

Hutchison has reproduced his experiments many times and the results are recorded on video and have been included in a number of TV documentaries that focus on unusual scientific experiments. Hutchison’s metal samples have been repeatedly tested by scientists, including a group at the Max Planck Institute in Germany, confirming Hutchison Effects.

The article by Wood and Hutchison (http://drjudywood.com/articles/JJ) documents effects and events seen in the vicinity of the World Trade Centre and compares these with observed characteristics of the Hutchison Effect.

The observed effects include:

“Weird Fires” - The fires seen near the badly damaged cars do not seem to ignite nearby office paper. Some photos show firefighters walking very close to or even through the fires. A video by John Hutchison shows similar looking “fires” on a model metal boat.

Bent Beams and “Jellification” - Samples that Hutchison produced show very unusual effects on metal. Sometimes the metal “jellifies,” turning soft and losing form, leading to severe bending or fracturing of the sample. Sometimes samples erupt from the centre and sometimes they turn to dust, similar to what happened to the WTC on 9/11.

Ongoing reactions - Hutchison’s samples often show an ongoing reaction, even after the energy field is removed. This “non-self-quenching” reaction seems to occur at the nuclear level. This also appears to be happening at Ground Zero (GZ). Dr. Wood’s study suggests that the WTC site is still being “decontaminated,” with trucks moving dirt into and out of the site, while “hosing down operations” continue, which Dr. Wood and Andrew Johnson photographed and recorded on video in January 2008.

Transmutation - Sometimes materials subjected to the Hutchison Effect seem to change at a molecular or even atomic level. This could be the explanation for the apparent rapid rusting at GZ, where steel rusts like iron. Also, some photographs show unusual effects on the aluminium cladding used on the twin towers that look similar to effects produced on Hutchison’s aluminum samples.

Wood, Hutchison, and Johnson appeared on two Ambrose Lane shows, “We Ourselves,” and discussed the similarities between the WTC event and the experimental evidence produced by the Hutchison Effect. “I have been collecting data over the last year and a half or so and I have found these distinct and unusual characteristics, which I have given names such as ‘fuming’ and ‘toasted’ cars – I have even noticed flipped cars in some pictures,” said Wood. “In some cases, the flipped cars are sitting next to trees that are fully covered with leaves.”

“If the flipping of the cars was caused by big explosions or ‘wind’ from the towers coming down,” asked Johnson, “how did the leaves stay on the trees?” Material scientist George Hathaway observes that the Hutchison Effect causes either lift or disruption of the material itself. Lift explains the flipped cars. (http://drjudywood.com/pdf/HutchisonEffectReport_txt.pdf )

In some of his experiments, Hutchison observed “spontaneous combustion” where “fires appeared out of nowhere.” He also confirmed that Col. John Alexander and others from the U.S. military visited him in 1983 and filmed his experiments with a team from Los Alamos National Laboratories (LANL). (http://www.weourselves.org/mp3/wpfw_011808_judy-andrew2.mp3 ) Canadian MP Chuck Cook and Dr Lorn A Kuehne of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) contacted him in 1986 and told him his work was “a matter of National Security.” (http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html) Hutchison says he’s been told that defense contractor, S.A.I.C., has his technology and has been developing it. (http://drjudywood.com/media/071212_JohnHutchison-TruthH.mp3 )

Asked about ongoing dirt removal and hosing down at the WTC complex, Hutchison commented, “I think there is an ongoing reaction or ‘infection.’” Wood noted that the damage done to the Bankers Trust (Deutsche Bank) building was repaired, but then they decided to take the building down. This evidence indicates there is a continuing reaction there. Rusting beams in the Bankers Trust building and in the temporary PATH train station also suggest ongoing reactions too.

At the end of the first show, a caller said, “This is a revelation beyond revelations…this trumps everything…If this story ever gets out, it will change the course of the United States’ and the whole world’s history.”

Another caller said during the second show, “I am thinking that these revelations we are hearing this morning should have the people so excited and so outraged that they should be flooding the lines to their congressmen and news people to get this message out as the number one story of the year.”

For more information please see:
http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/

WPFW Related:
http://www.weourselves.org/
http://www.wpfw.org/

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
David Howard's picture

The DEW Hangout was created ...

... to lay claim for all the "exotic" phenomena that arose from the use of nuclear bombs in the WTC, and concomitant EMPs, and subsequent China Syndrome.

http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com/

Andrew Johnson's picture

Silent, Invisible Nuclear Bombs?

Mr Howard,

Ed Ward has also put his weight behind the nuclear bombs theory. I therefore post the same response to you as I did to him:

I can confidently say that Dr Wood's study and general conclusion explain the most evidence of any set of theories out there. Additionally, Dr Wood's background is the most suitable of any of the people that have "stepped out of the box" to deal with 9/11 issues.

The problems with both the Thermite theory and the "Nuke" theory are that they cannot explain any of the evidence listed below.

1) There were no really bright flashes as the towers turned to dust.
2) There were no loud explosions as the towers turned to dust.
3) There was little or no heat in the dust cloud.
4) To my knowledge, there is no publicly viewable research on small, concealable nuclear explosives.
5) Nuclear explosives cannot account for the 24-foot circular holes seen in the buildings and in the street.
6) The nuke or "large explosive/incendiary" does not explain the flipped cars and vehicles.

Further:

The tritium effects are also seen in cold fusion reactions, but attempts were made to cover these up. Dr Wood's study references this data on page 7.

The wind affecting the cars SELECTIVELY, is not supported by evidence - wind doesn't behave like this. We have video of the dust cloud and we know it was travelling at less than 100mph (perhaps more like 20 or 25 mph). Going by what Tornadoes do, I think winds well in excess of 100mph are required to flip cars.

rick's picture

What is Wood's Real Background?

Additionally, Dr Wood's background

Only what you have assumed, only what you assume.

Woods, another pied piper taking you to the futile road of "prove it or lose it."

Imagine your child is raped in the living room. Judy Wood is a doctor and the best one to tell you who and how the rape occurred. 7 years later she is still pontificating and talking about large round objects that may have entered to do the dirty work. In the meantime 3000 more of your children are raped up in their bedrooms, your car was stolen, your job, money and rights were stolen as you are busy trying to find out HOW the guy, who is still upstairs raping your children, raped the first kid. Somehow the culprits have you believing if you can prove it something would be done and the raping would stop and all the wealth and rights returned to the people. Real Rocky Horror fairy tales -or- a sucker born every second.

This is 911 truth awareness.

Andrew Johnson's picture

I don't understand this comment.

I have been looking at the data Judy Wood has put on the table. We have talked a lot and know each other quite well. Her background has some similarities to my own and bears no relation to any comments you make above, from what I can work out.

You can start your own legal case, on a different basis. Judy Wood isn't asking anyone to "follow her pipe". She points out that she has put data on the table and taken action, with the help of others, based on her conclusions.

ANyone else can come up with their own verison of this. It works better that way, I think.

David Howard's picture

Mr. Johnson,

google: APFN - mini-nukes and micro-nukes

Andrew Johnson's picture

APFN Mininukes

Are they silent, give off little or no heat and almost no radiation?

David Howard's picture

9/11 and cancer

google: WTC Cancer Cluster Like Hiroshima

Nuclear weapons were involved in the destruction of the WTC (1,2,7) towers: "Beyond any reasonable doubt"

http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/

http://wtc-chinasyndrome.blogspot.com/

theSaiGirl's picture

Proving the precise kind of weaponry used is a black hole

These are classified weapons.

Anyone associated with their development or use, whether military, DoD, DoE or private contractors have signed "confidentiality"agreements and would risk immediate arrest for blowing the whistle and exposing the details.

====
American scientists acceded to the imposition of secrecy in a pragmatic and patriotic adjustment to the context of the Cold War. Scientists and managers in the national laboratory system accommodated the demands of national security within a classified community, composed of a system of secret conferences, publications, and interlocking committees.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/q823873117565h14/
http://www.springerlink.com/index/Q823873117565H14.pdf

Their very job titles and security level classifications carry signed commitments (secrecy oaths) to maintain silence.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/232

Moreover, all public officials are protected by the doctrine of "sovereign immunity".
http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/s103.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_immunity

The NIST officials targeted by Jerry Leaphart and Morgan Reynolds in their suit are beyond the reach of existing criminal law.
http://www.prleap.com/pr/92756/

Ergo:
The most viable evidence, with the most realistic prospect of making it into court FIRST, is the evidence of TV fakery.
Since the media networks, strictly private (although regulated by the FCC) enjoy no such legal protections to hide behind.

Hence the political imperative to make the TV fakery our top strategic priority in mass education, cadre development and movement organizing:
http://911logic.blogspot.com/2007/04/earth-is-not-flat.html

David Howard's picture

we got nuked on 9/11

google: APFN - ULTRASCRIBE 116939

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.

Sponsor

User login

Subscribe

9/11 Researchers - Open Resource for 9/11 Researchers

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Web Pages referring to this page
Link to this page and get a link back!