Who Will You Tell?

Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Mon, 2008-03-24 15:05.

Here is a video I made (7:23 length).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0EsJhEFz9A

Please review and share widely. Thank you.

============

The WTC Complex was destroyed using some type of technology related to that used to create the Hutchison effect. This is what the The WTC Complex was destroyed using some type of technology related to that used to create the Hutchison effect. This is what the evidence shows. Free energy is real. The War on Terror is fake. Who will you tell?

http://www.drjudywood.com/
http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/
http://www.checktheevidence.com/

Andrew Johnson's blog

Login or register to post comments

1335 reads

Free Energy WTC Hutchison Effect Judy Wood

WTC destructions were nuclear

Submitted by Coffinman on Mon, 2008-03-24 17:16.

Wether knowingly or stupidly, you are covering up the use of nuclear devices being used in N.Y..
JW is a fraud as proven by me:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/738 and etc.
Her allies are liars and idiots, that's all.
She even lied about the cars that were blasted by the towers and said that they were on FDR drive when they were crisped, when in fact they had been moved there after the event.
Also you have included Hutchison's fake video that he made after he lost all of his gear.
Great stuff: Fake video to enforce a fake analysis, from a fake "professor". Priceless.
Here's a video I made:
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=fZCFxj5NFe0
Coffinman

Silent, Invisible Nuclear Bombs?

Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Mon, 2008-03-24 23:31.

OK Coffinman, you're right. I'm a fraud too, mate. Read this and deal with the evidence, if you please.

http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=...

Thanks, old boy!

Oops - looks like the nuke theory's not flying, so it's "all out insult and disparaging remark" time - and b*gger the actual evidence, and court cases!! i.e. John Hutchison is, in principle, prepared to go to prison for giving evidence in the court case

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html

The gauntlet lies with you now... Can you take it up without more disparaging remarks? Take your evidence to Court and I will be there applauding you if you can build a case...

9/11 and cancer is the key!

Submitted by David Howard on Tue, 2008-03-25 00:23.

The spectrum and percentages of cancer are massive. There are at least 4 classifications of blood-cell cancers: leukemia, lymphoma, Hodgkin's and myeloma. There are many more classifications of soft tissue cancers.

http://www.911researchers.com/node/1075

Cancer has multiple causes!

Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Wed, 2008-03-26 00:05.

Carcinogenic compounds in the dust, being one. Ongoing low-level nuclear reactions are possibly another (such as those appearing to be happening at GZ with the hosing down and in former BT building)

But Mr Howard has to post all the nuke stuff and like so many persist with a narrow focus of evidence - which is a way NOT to solve crimes.

Try to make as few assumptions as possible.

Mr. Johnson,

Submitted by David Howard on Wed, 2008-03-26 00:35.

google: WTC Cancer Cluster Like Hiroshima

Silent?

Submitted by rick on Tue, 2008-03-25 09:16.

I beg to differ old boy. My tape has quite loud explosions that can be seen and heard quite clearly. Specifically in the North Tower, where I had the best view, where the fireball and the sounds could be seen and heard respectively more than 2 miles away. Of course 911truth movement has distorted the tape and in Shafquats 911mysteries even changed reality so you have to get 911raw to find the real truth. It is there. Just hard to find as the movement buries truth.

I am not interested in saying Hutcheson is a fraud, I liked his stuff when I saw it long ago. However proof is, of course, in duplication and it may seem sad to some that he may have to prove his theory. To others it may be vindication. But your tie to 9/11 is on a thread so slim as not to arrive.

Music was nice

Submitted by rick on Tue, 2008-03-25 19:15.

It got tedious about five minutes and I would cut it there.

This is just rehashed stuff from before. What stops the guy from doing this again? I saw when they went out to his farm and it was not complicated, or so it seemed.

Wood is not a viable alternative.

You are what amounts to shilling for her.

You can see a fire ball erupt out of the top floors of the North Tower before it explodes to dust. People on the ground were picked up by a hot wind and thrown in the air. I felt it, saw it and heard it 2 miles away. I have a tape that backs up every word. My tape was not edited by 911truth.

No loud sound AS THE TOWERS WERE COMING DOWN

Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Wed, 2008-03-26 00:03.

No one on the scene reported loud explosions as the towers were coming down - a rushing/thrushing sound is one example. "Like an aeroplane approaching" is another.

Certainly, it seems there WERE loud explosions BEFORE the towers came down.

You can call it shilling if you like Rick, personally, I am looking at evidence and focusing on that. Lookin at photo, video and witness testimony. The best match is with Hutch Effects - study the evidence - rather than just *primarily* focusing on WHO is presenting it (though yes, that can be important too). Judy and I have FULL transparency.

By the way, I am NOT a video editor. I am a software engineer and sort of work in education - EVERYTHING else is self-taught and I have NEVER earned money from that sort of work either.

Did the Hutchison effect cause Wood's fake uni photo?

Submitted by Coffinman on Wed, 2008-03-26 02:05.

[Judy and I have FULL transparency.]
-Does that mean that you can explain why she refused to utter a word about crash physics?
Or why she completely ignores fakery in some of her "evidential photos"?
Or why she still supports Fetzer/Loose change/911mysteries?
Or why the feet are missing from the badly photoshopped fake photo of her uni class?
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/images/Woodphoneyclassphoto.jpg
http://www.coffinman.co.uk/images/Woodphoneyclassphotofeet.jpg
And etc.

Also:
You presented a video featuring faked video from Hutchison.
Ace debunked it all rather well on his blog, but I notice that you made vague reference to other video that you contend may be more genuine.
I will repeat the remark that I made there here, for you to respond to:
Andrew can you please link to specific videos.
Vague references to video "alleged to exist" will not do here.
It is being strongly suggested that Hutchison has a history of obtaining money by deception and therefore his latest collaboration with the entity referred to as Wood could be more of the same.
I am particularly anxious to see any evidence that he actually achieved any effects in his experiments at all.
Do you have any solid evidence, Andrew? (faked video will not do).

Maybe "Hutchison effect" = fooling people with fake imagery.
Maybe therefore the "Hutchison effect" can explain the fake uni photo (and more).

Coffinman

Maybe "Hutchison effect" = fooling people with fake imagery.

Submitted by Andrew Johnson on Sun, 2008-03-30 23:04.

Lol - yeah right. Check out the documentation before you make such ridiculous statements.

Here's one for you

http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/JJ/JJ8.html

and another

http://www.checktheevidence.com/pdf/Hutchison%20Effect%20FOIA%20from%20B...

Oh dear - looks like JH is prepared to go to prison for giving false evidence. How about you Coffinman?

Sponsor

Our Mission

Navigation

Popular content

All time:

Recent comments

9/11 Researchers