Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
2 weeks 6 days ago - what?
2 weeks 6 days ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
3 weeks 10 hours ago - depends on settings
3 weeks 23 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
3 weeks 1 day ago - Never saw the comment
3 weeks 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
3 weeks 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
3 weeks 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
3 weeks 2 days ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
3 weeks 2 days ago
The hunt is on
One thing stood out on the 'secretblog' was the link to a video that focusses upon killtown not saying his name or meeting anyone.
SO WHAT!
I am all for anonymity on the web.
He/she may very well be a masquerade but i hardly find credance in the evidence of, or 'lack of', his/her name.
If the right to anonymity is synonymous with guilt, then those munchkins in this circus hunt have forgotten freedom, justice and innocent until proven guilty.
They produce absolutely nothing of merit other than 'truthiness' to character assassinate 'killtown'.
Anonymous
I think it is the right of an anonymous person to do as they please. I think that anonymous leaders are worse than the ones they have already, who do not have a problem exposing their idiocy as their own in real life.
I am going to tell you what to think and what is evidence and what is not but you cannot ever know who I am? I cannot stand by my assertions? Pontif pontificus.
The right to anonymity is synonymous with lack of credence and responsibility. That is not a place of trust and authority.
Killtown proved itself a negative here about a year ago and I am very happy to be without it. I don't trust it. These people have one problem with freedom, they don't just leave it and stop paying attention. You have to click to get to it. Don't click, don't link, and say goodbye.
To be anon or not to be
I guess in order to gain trust and credibility from a group of like minded people there are certain requirements --
if someone i hung around with for one year didnt tell me his/her real name and i was calling them 'shizzle' i would have alarm bells ringing for the sanity of that person and for my own acceptance of that situation.
fair enuff
and if you stalked val
and if you stalked val mclatchy for 6 years,
outted her exact residential and work address [her own business] would you then expect to remain anonymous?.
it's a stoopid suggestion.
IF PEOPLE STALK THEN THEY MUST BE OK WITH THE SAME.
the blog is set up by sparks as far as i can tell.
and i'm rootin for em.
until kt is left stripped of all secrecy
i do not think enough will ever be enough.
people are getting very close.
killtown knows this is comeing,
he could come out today.
at least tell us what city he lives in.
BUT HE WON'T .
so soon someone will out him/her.
and he/she will whine like a bitch.
but it is their own faults.
jennifer wynhausen does some of the blogging.
she has perfect grammar, syntax, and spelling.
there is another killtown who does not.
info is raining in at the moment stay tuned.
killtown is just another perp.
this is just another perp hunt.
apparently anonymous are helping out. :)
sooner or later the goose will be cooked.