Today the page to John Lear was removed from Wiki. The son of the inventor of the Lear Jet is no longer a person even worthy of a stub at the government directed Israeli owned Weakipedia. It is a shame but that is how they work. Wikipeadia is NOT an encyclopedia, it is a hand edited newspeak journal of new history re-written by those who "care" so that it does not scare anyone.
Its a simple mix of Joseph Keith and Morgan Reynolds.
I dont think the argument of "turbofan will max out at xxxmph" will ever convince anyone of no-planes striking the wtc 1 and 2.
Also i dont think the argument of Keith that the plane would shake itself apart is useful.
As far as i am concerned this is another step away from concentrating upon the buildings while placing faith in a so-called 'expert' whos argument produces nothing of fact for the specific event discussed.
i.e if,as we have been told, the plane descended rapidly to strike the wtc what difference would a turbofan have upon 280tns + gravity plus momentum. A turbofan wont slow that object down significantly. A plane could make 600mph and strike a building with a turbofan and before any resonance break it up.
Both keith and lear both acknowledge fake videos and as such cannot comment upon speed or shakersystems with regard to a plane there is no footage of.
google: Morgan Reynolds on the 911 Hoax
google: (NBB) by Morgan Reynolds
CIA Funded Wiki Removes John Lear Page
Today the page to John Lear was removed from Wiki. The son of the inventor of the Lear Jet is no longer a person even worthy of a stub at the government directed Israeli owned Weakipedia. It is a shame but that is how they work. Wikipeadia is NOT an encyclopedia, it is a hand edited newspeak journal of new history re-written by those who "care" so that it does not scare anyone.
King Lear
Its a simple mix of Joseph Keith and Morgan Reynolds.
I dont think the argument of "turbofan will max out at xxxmph" will ever convince anyone of no-planes striking the wtc 1 and 2.
Also i dont think the argument of Keith that the plane would shake itself apart is useful.
As far as i am concerned this is another step away from concentrating upon the buildings while placing faith in a so-called 'expert' whos argument produces nothing of fact for the specific event discussed.
i.e if,as we have been told, the plane descended rapidly to strike the wtc what difference would a turbofan have upon 280tns + gravity plus momentum. A turbofan wont slow that object down significantly. A plane could make 600mph and strike a building with a turbofan and before any resonance break it up.
Both keith and lear both acknowledge fake videos and as such cannot comment upon speed or shakersystems with regard to a plane there is no footage of.