Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
2 weeks 6 days ago - what?
2 weeks 6 days ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
3 weeks 11 hours ago - depends on settings
3 weeks 1 day ago - gengho continues to prove his
3 weeks 1 day ago - Never saw the comment
3 weeks 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
3 weeks 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
3 weeks 2 days ago - This below is my conclusive
3 weeks 2 days ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
3 weeks 2 days ago
polygraph- subjective
Just like a Judge in court, the questioner/reader of the polygraph/the interpreter is relied upon to decipher the recordings. The 'truth' is not found in the individuals statements but in the conclusion made by the expert on behalf of the interviewee.
Truth is not fact, and they shall not intertwine.
polygraph - lie detector
My goal is to make polygraph test results admissible as evidence in courts worldwide.
lie detector - court
There will be two big opponents to this;
1) judges
2) lawyers
Judges like the job of deciding and would prefer not to have a polygraph reader take their jobs.
Lawyers like the job of lying, twisting, baffling and confusing people and would prefer not to have a polygraph reader take their job.
So ... good luck...
wt?
is this running joke still going?.
has anyone considered the idea that david is a bot?,
who said polygraphs wouldn't be accepted anywhere?.
what would you suggest for the people with metabolisms that fool polygraphs?.
let the lucky ones go free?.
how will you take out the massive known human failings and errors?.
how will you stop the inconsistant results?.
this is some dumb shit right here.
i simply cannot believe that you are still spouting this stuff.
George Bush Sr. will squeal on everyone ...
involved in planning and executing the 9/11 attacks, when he's asked to submit to an FBI polygraph test.
There are many here amoung us
who hear the wind blow.
I like those lie detectors. Everyone should take one. What is to fear but fear itself.
Who would be left in the "truth" movement even given the small percent of inconsistantcies?
When those of us who got close to those people I always thought "no one can be that dumb" specially the likes of Fetzer and the rest bootlicking degrees. It did not take a lie detector to realize he gave new dimension to the word lie but it would make a good show.
"They" use it on their own and I think there is a campaign to keep it "in-house" by diversion. It is a screening tool. For what I want to do I am happy to cast the inconsistant people to the wind and keep the 100 percents. Gimme that machine and the 911 truth heads will roll.
Bush could not pass that if he was trained. He can't lie on Tv. Anyone can see through him. His lack of talent will come out.
a bot
a bot that can start threads... impressive.
No no genghis it is far far more scary than that -- its called 'individualism'.
Your idea of lunacy is another persons sanity.
Fiction and truth intertwine making a fantastic albeit wacky world.