The United States Government War on the Internet
Introduction
This Book will bring to the public the various efforts the powers that rule are using to combat dissent and bring the population under control and subjected to their rule using the Internet.
Through a series of developments and purchases the government will become the commercial provider of choice for all informational services and will be able to provide all information to their "Freedom Warriors" at a moments notice. Those who will not fall in line will be "killed off."
I have uploaded the two documents from the government’s archives. One is the Secret Department of Defense Information Operations Roadmap from October 2001. This declaration of war on the Internet containis objectives and some of the groundwork to be implemented is testimony to what we see happening around us. I will show you how one of the first purchases from this “roadmap” was the largest communication network, the “IRC Chat” network.
The DISA document is the information infrastructures plans to implement a small portion of this plan. It is the first where we see “Freedom Warriors” and the killing off of anyone who did not get with their program.
In the next weeks this book will develop and you are welcome to help.
Rick Siegel
The first stages of this 'war' is already upon us
It is the prevention of Free Speech under the guise of 'anti-SPAM'.
Now, I have never sent any SPAM e-mails in my life. I have never even sent a Large Zwicker*
[* A 'Large Zwicker' is where someone such as Barrie Zwicker, Dick Eastman, Kyle Hence, Ron Corvus, etc. infests your Inbox with their spew. Yes, you can use an E-mail Filter. But you can also make them remove you from their Address Books by means of a Large Zwicker. This comprises creating an E-mail that says (Subject Line) "Please remove me from your Address Book", and attach some moderately large video of some kind. Then keep sending this until you receive 'bounce-backs' due to "Mailbox Full". A 'Large Zwicker' tends to be 100% effective]
What is happening is this. 'Anti-SPAM recommendation' sites are springing up, for example Spamhaus. These maintain 'blacklists' of so-called 'Spammers'.
The problem is that they will add anyone's E-mail Address to their list, without any evidence of spamming (e.g. on NSA recommendation?). Whatever their claims, their actual methodology must, therefore, be arbitrary.
Therefore anyone with an E-mail Address is fair game to them.
The Mail Handlers in large ISPs now contain embedded code that defers to these 'SPAM blacklists'.
The result is that E-mails to friends and contacts get bounced back to the Sender, with the message "Blocked for SPAM'. The friend or contact has no knowledge that this is happening, unless there is some other means of contact.
However, you have to be careful. This effect is cumulative. You may make contact in order to bring the situation to your friend's attention, but the channel you used can then become blacklisted automatically.
These bounce-backs offer the Sender the ability to question the situation, by supplying details.
You should take offence at this for the simple reason that they had no right to squash your 1st Amendment rights in the first place, let alone compound the situation by demanding even more information about you.
And, of course, the corollary of all this is that, while their mechanisms are blocking contacts between friends, each is getting just the same amount of real SPAM as they ever did.
That's how we know the whole thing is a scam.
Methods of extraction from this Fruit Loop:
1) If the friend or contact (Recipient) makes enough 'noise', possibly even threatening a $225 Federal Lawsuit for 1st Amendment violations, then the ISP can be made to back down, and remove all filtering. [Note: This 'filtering' is put into place without your friend/contact's knowledge or consent. Unless they demand the information, their ISP won't bother to inform them E-mails are being bounced on their behalf. The same applies to you, and your ISP]
2) One thing the Sender can do is to contact the AS site directly [the Domain Name should be somewhere in the bounce-back Header], and demand to see 'the evidence'. The AS site will sometimes back down on the basis that they are empty-handed in this respect.
But do not be surprised to be bounced from ISP to AS site … and back again. This is designed to keep clean hands all round, where the AS site is only 'recommending', and the ISP is simply 'acting upon recommendation'.
It's all totally illegal, of course.
And, of course, there is the other possibility. Which is that the SPAM is being generated by the anti-SPAM sites. In the same way that it is perfectly possible for the viruses to be generated by the 'anti-Virus' manufacturers. [It would be a 'nice little earner', wouldn't it?]
Who knows? Who knows that Micro$oft are not involved in creating Viruses? I don't know. But, like a good Conspiracy Theorist, I don't dismiss these possibilities.