No planes, and besides, big Boeing Passenger Jets are not stealthy. They CANNOT disappear of radar. If radar cannot see a big passenger jet, what on earth CAN it see?
There were "War Games" (Exercise Drills) running ... Northern Vigilance, Vigilant Guardian & Vigilant Warrior, etc. (There were more, Tripd II, for example).
For the 'games' false Radar blips were inserted into FAA screens, to make it look like 'hijacked aircraft'.
But there was no need to actually intercept electronically-inserted Radar blips.
I agree, all the footage of the planes is completely manufactured.
The Fairbanks video is a version with a glaring error left on screen which occurred due to its unique production.
The error is that the building pillar left screen at the start is curved and actually corrects itself as the camera pans the viewing area. If the 'fisheye lens' was producing this, the same area on screen would be affected. It isn't.
I submit that the camera is recording a fake image. The man and car are in between the fake image and camera. The man, it has been claimed, was an F.B.I agent.
Nobody has ever been able to answer this, perhaps one of you might? If you look at the photo again you will see, just above the G-Man's arm, there is a large reflective thing with "plane". Now, is it a reflection or is it a projection? Watch the video!
Would that reflection have been possible? Any good geometry heads here?
Coffinman
This is a good question.
There is indeed an apparent reflection in the car window.
How can this be?
It is an unanswered question.
Because no airliner could have gone and parked up inside the building before exploding.
Also seen in this same clip, the bank of lights behind the guy's head blinks off at the same time as the explosion occurs.
airtraffic controllers did track planes that day, but they were moving so much like military arcraft that they would never believe them to be boeings. i do believe there was a white plane at wtc. i have just upped 4 clips of it to youtube, along with a trafficers radio call saying that the plane was leaving wtc, and that it must be flight 11. the fact that a boeing cannot basically go off radar has always troubled me. the impossible flying techniques of these planes has always been a problem. how's this, maybe these planes were all created electronically. the computers logged them after the govt. put them there and of course aa could never say anything, and they haven't . they have remained remarkebly silent. why have they never mentioned loud and clear that the hijackers did not have tickets?. were no on the manifests?. wouldn't they like to come forward with this?. no.aa and boeing is owned by our good treasonous friends and were told to shut up. wouldn't the big lump on the bottom of that plane maybe come up in the 911 commission?. i mean we all saw it.
i personally think it was more simple than this. they relied on people's confusion and the media to tell people what they saw, but this video has certainly opened my eyes to real time trickery. thanks for the rip.
Yes. There were NO planes!
Yes. There were NO planes! Occam is writ large on this one.
The idea that the planes could get "lost" is absurd!
No planes, and besides, big Boeing Passenger Jets are not stealthy. They CANNOT disappear of radar. If radar cannot see a big passenger jet, what on earth CAN it see?
Psychology of Wartime Mind Control and Domestic Covert Operations
Fred
Yes ... there were no Commercial Airliners ....
... and therefore no Jet Fuel, and no Stand Down.
There were "War Games" (Exercise Drills) running ... Northern Vigilance, Vigilant Guardian & Vigilant Warrior, etc. (There were more, Tripd II, for example).
For the 'games' false Radar blips were inserted into FAA screens, to make it look like 'hijacked aircraft'.
But there was no need to actually intercept electronically-inserted Radar blips.
Fairbanks
I agree, all the footage of the planes is completely manufactured.
The Fairbanks video is a version with a glaring error left on screen which occurred due to its unique production.
The error is that the building pillar left screen at the start is curved and actually corrects itself as the camera pans the viewing area. If the 'fisheye lens' was producing this, the same area on screen would be affected. It isn't.
high quality footage - direct link to avi
screen shot of the error
I submit that the camera is recording a fake image. The man and car are in between the fake image and camera. The man, it has been claimed, was an F.B.I agent.
on reflection
Nobody has ever been able to answer this, perhaps one of you might? If you look at the photo again you will see, just above the G-Man's arm, there is a large reflective thing with "plane". Now, is it a reflection or is it a projection? Watch the video!
Would that reflection have been possible? Any good geometry heads here?
The reflection of the plane
Coffinman
This is a good question.
There is indeed an apparent reflection in the car window.
How can this be?
It is an unanswered question.
Because no airliner could have gone and parked up inside the building before exploding.
Also seen in this same clip, the bank of lights behind the guy's head blinks off at the same time as the explosion occurs.
Ah, its a car or truck
Ah, its a car or truck window. Well spotted CM!
also
airtraffic controllers did track planes that day, but they were moving so much like military arcraft that they would never believe them to be boeings. i do believe there was a white plane at wtc. i have just upped 4 clips of it to youtube, along with a trafficers radio call saying that the plane was leaving wtc, and that it must be flight 11. the fact that a boeing cannot basically go off radar has always troubled me. the impossible flying techniques of these planes has always been a problem. how's this, maybe these planes were all created electronically. the computers logged them after the govt. put them there and of course aa could never say anything, and they haven't . they have remained remarkebly silent. why have they never mentioned loud and clear that the hijackers did not have tickets?. were no on the manifests?. wouldn't they like to come forward with this?. no.aa and boeing is owned by our good treasonous friends and were told to shut up. wouldn't the big lump on the bottom of that plane maybe come up in the 911 commission?. i mean we all saw it.
TIAR
Total Immersions Augmented Reality
video presentation
real and virtual can be mixed together in real time. Reacting with the real world.
The plane, in many of the videos, was created through this process.
that's amazing
i personally think it was more simple than this. they relied on people's confusion and the media to tell people what they saw, but this video has certainly opened my eyes to real time trickery. thanks for the rip.