Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
2 weeks 6 days ago - what?
2 weeks 6 days ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
3 weeks 12 hours ago - depends on settings
3 weeks 1 day ago - gengho continues to prove his
3 weeks 1 day ago - Never saw the comment
3 weeks 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
3 weeks 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
3 weeks 2 days ago - This below is my conclusive
3 weeks 2 days ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
3 weeks 2 days ago
the hippie video
is called the race to zero point energy. it's amazing. a lot of stuff can be gleaned from it about heaps of subjects. i stole some stuff about the b2 from it, electrifying the leading edge of the wing and charging the exhaust reduces the weight of the plane by 80% and there's a canadian, hutchison who can lift heavy objects with current. and a guy who did that knife melted into a block of alloy at room temp trick.
but i never really research the demo much i look to the sky for the answers. i believe that demolition will lead us to a dead end in a chinese scrapyard. whereas the lack of planes is easily provable, once people get over their brainwashing and media hypnosis. it's already half done 93 and 77 are officially debunked as far as i'm concerned
Coffinman The race to zero
Coffinman
The race to zero point
Jones Used Classic Disinfo Tactics
Notice how he kept referring everyone to his site instead of responding to Dr Fetzer's concerns directly?
Classis disinfo tactic!
Perhaps we can have a contest? How many times did Jones use disinfo???
See here:
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/disinfo.html
Twenty-Five Ways To Suppress Truth: The Rules of Disinformation
(Includes The 8 Traits of A Disinformationalist)
Steve Jones Never Answers a Quesion
It has always been his habit of avoiding questions. Just point them to an incredibly long URL with error filled paper. If questioned just tell them you answered that in the fine paper by Dr. Siegel on the site.
As the talk progressed you may have noted the famous nuclear physicist as he talks about 1940's bombs and testing instead of advanced shape charge minis with no radiation. Maybe he is just the good ole bumbling professor and just forgot the 50 years of secret advances.
The nice touch is the third eye that Barrette represents. That awful "humanists" thing at the end. Barrett walks in to stand in the middle, as "us" that each side should convince. The mans job is to make sure that two sides always exist. Like the great banker Morgan, Barrette encourages divisiveness and is more than happy to stand in the middle to keep them separate. Good going Barrette.
Jones was asked if he was trying to get to the samples of newly discovered steel buried at the NY site. He claimed that he has enough? It is assuring that Steven Jones has enough evidence in his hands yet all he does is support criminal actions of his cronies Dane Floum and his dance partner Fred Burks. If he is so sure, why has he not done anything?
I bet after that they all went to cheer Sofia on her great disinfo 911Mysteries.
I fell asleep.
what a dreary uninspiring conference. Who was that bald guy who introduced them? I'm balding myself but I would have worn a hat or smiled or something. He kind of crept up to the podium. Then Jim launching into his fighting talk and surprisingly getting a warm reception from the folk who call him a disinfo clown. I thought he did okay and was brave to face a hall full of spooks. At least he stuck out for Judy and Morgan which is a bit like defending the devil to a hall full of Baptists.
I have never seen Jones look more shifty or unhappy to be there. I feel sorry for his guy as I think he is doing something he knows is wrong but can't get out of. Thank God we can say what we say with a clear conscience.
PhD Congrats
I could rant about the video but i wont. I just have one question;
Did you, Judy, Nico or Morgan get an invite to it so they could, if necessary, say something on their own behalf?
It was with great gratitude to accept this PhD
Well I never did. Williams did ask me to suggest alternative speakers but I drew a blank. I really could not suggest anyone who would want to address this garbage.
What do I say to a blind idiot who keeps asking me to answer for the woman on the other side of the room or the one already in his embrace? What does he want? A paper on why he lies? Why he stepped all over the cold fusion research? Why he defends criminals as moralistic? Why he defends Jesus in Louisiana? Why the government stole our freedom to keep others from being jealous?
This jerk thinks I am going to sit down to appease his desire for my work? Anyway it is all there in my paper at 9/11 Year End Exposure
I would debate him but he does not do that. He needs a back office in DC to write his response - no speaking!
he dont answer
I would debate him but he does not do that. He needs a back office in DC to write his response - no speaking!
yeah, i instantly recognised that after reading the emails on Holmgrens website.
Barium, yes, there's barium in military-grade aluminothermics.
"Then at 57:25 Steven Jones mentions barium? In Thermite? What is all that about?"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermite
Under Military Uses.
"Thermate-TH3 is a mixture of thermite and pyrotechnic additives which have been found to be superior to standard thermite for incendiary purposes. Its composition by weight is generally 68.7% thermite, 29.0% barium nitrate, 2.0% sulfur and 0.3% binder."
thermite and rdx
2 THINGS
1ST
I would never say that these elements were not present.
What concerns me about Jonesy is that he takes potshots at other investigations namely 'tv fakery' and 'DEW' and refuses to provide alternative explanations for the evidence shown to him.
His basis for thermite BEFORE the towers were pulverised is extremely weak. He cannot ascertain what the molten metal dripping from the tower just after WTC2 exploded was. He cannot, it is impossible to state conclusively. So then he relies upon photo evidence after the pulverisation but again has no way to prove that the glowing mass is steel or aluminium clinging to steel. Then a firefighters video emerges in which these guys talk of 'rivers of lava'. Ok, they saw molten metal but one cannot ascertain the element.
Again and again the basis for thermite/thermate is weak and would be blown out of court.
Upon this basis he launches into ridiculing DEW and tv fakery.
but heres my point.... he doesnt answer questions about DEW and tv fakery because he tries to insinuate that thermite is taking all of his brainpower.. well then.. if thats the case he should shut-the-hell-up about other evidence that isnt thermite related.
2ND
If 180,000tns of steel were shipped to China, that means that all the steel from the buildings fell onto the ground.
Now, heres the logic problem... Jones illustrates in the video presentation that building debris fell onto WTC3
picture used
carving this hole into the side of the building
wtc3
Fine and dandy. Seems plausible but, prof jones, if that debris was able to cut through that steel sectioned building why did the 'basement mall' survive the impact of the 180,000tns of steel falling down?
7 floors of WTC3 are completely destroyed.. ( i would venture completely missing) by falling debris (jonesy et al explanation) and we are expected to believe that Bugs Bunny and the mall survived the impact of falling debris?
Here is where Judy Wood indicates something very very odd.
Bathtub and holes in buildings.
Prof Jones et al. you cant have one or the other.
lets get real, eh?