Press Release: Fraud/Deception - NIST's 9/11 Report

Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Fri, 2007-03-23 07:49

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/070322_PR.html

REQUESTS FOR CORRECTION OF NIST REPORT ON DESTRUCTION OF WORLD TRADE CENTER FILED

FRAUD AND DECEPTION CITED AS REASONS FOR CORRECTION REQUEST
March 22, 2007

[excerpt]
Dr. Judy Wood (with degrees in Civil Engineering, Engineering Mechanics, and Materials Engineering Science), widely acknowledged as the leading proponent of the theory that Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) were used to destroy the World Trade Center (WTC) complex, has filed a Request for Correction under the Data Quality Act with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), located in Gaithersburg, MD.

Dr. Wood is represented in this effort by Attorney Jerry Leaphart, a Connecticut-based trial lawyer, who states that NIST now has 60 days to respond to the RFC. After that, an appeal can be taken and/or other legal action may then follow.

[See Here For Full Press Release: http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/070322_PR.html ]

CB_Brooklyn's blog

Login or register to post comments

1071 reads

Thanks CB ....

Submitted by Veronica on Fri, 2007-03-23 09:30.

... I was going to post this ... you've saved me the trouble.

(Note: Ed Hass - Muckraker Report - also filed an RFC on NIST a few weeks ago ... I've got a link somewhere ...)

Double thanks

Submitted by rick on Fri, 2007-03-23 14:09.

I am going to write a piece about it.

But the point is that some people take actions while others just drip like a leaky faucet.

I noted that "George Washington" Flim Flam Floum has taken several notes from my site.

The latest is his Great Idea for the march on DC. Now when you look at his stuff you see he has been gleaning ideas from yours truly. Sure he only starts reading in the last months, but he knows what he has to divert and make useless.

Perhaps he will distribute V masks so that the full circus can go on and then have Albaneser study the cult for mass media.

While the farcical circus of 911truthers careens from side to side there are some who keep moving on. It is funny to see the stone throwing floggers doing nothing but throwing stones while those getting the hits are actually TRYING to do SOMETHING.

RFC

Submitted by brianv on Fri, 2007-03-23 14:31.

Is there a time "window" for which a reply to a request like this must be sent? Great work from Morgan and Judy.

I don't have their intellect in these matters, I relied on the observation of real world objects to come to the conclusion that the planes were fake, with the help of the seriously dodgy photos and videos. These guys put it into words in a way which I sadly can't. I was one of the first proponents of the no-plane theory, for which I was ridiculed and called a junky wacko disinfo agent, wish I'd had these guys knowledge to back me up. We've seen the personal attacks recently on Dr Wood, I hope she makes them eat their words.

On another matter.

I happened across this page and photos last night. It's supposed to be some sort of attempt to raise the possibility that a plane actually did hit the Pentagon, due to the apparent lack of aircraft debris at the site. But what Mr Naval Intelligence conveniently overlooks is that the building is completely intact and the airplane obliterated. There isn't even an obvious impact point and there is no raging inferno and the airplane was comparable in size to a Boeing 757!

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/compare/c130crash.html

ps There is aircraft debris if you care to look!

NPT + TVF = We can all go home!

No 'Time Window' ...

Submitted by Veronica on Fri, 2007-03-23 16:00.

... that I know about and - even if there were - you can bet your sweet life they could come up with endless reasons for dragging the whole thing out ... much the same way they dragged out publishing the NIST Reports in the first place.

The idea is to throw a spanner in the works of the unpublished WTC7 Report ... because while these requests are pending, that Report is stymied ... to some extent.

Plus, of course, they are now aware that if they publish WTC7 bullshit similar to NICSTAR1, they will get Requests for Corrections.

Re: C130 crash: Did the building collapse into its own footprint, in less than 10 seconds, about 1 hour later? Had the walls of that Apartment Block been newly re-inforced? What happened to the Apartment Block's Missile Defence System?

What is the connection with

Submitted by ewing2001 on Sat, 2007-03-24 21:45.

What is the connection with this here?
I didn't open it yet:

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911
Request for Correction from NIST

You should not be looking at a WebSite ...

Submitted by Veronica on Sun, 2007-03-25 19:58.

... of someone you ex-communicated! (This can cause blindness and insanity. Mind you I saw someone asking recently "Is Nico Haupt clinically insane?". The answer is, of course, "No, he's German. That means he tends to think backwards. Nothing particularly wrong in that, as anyone who knows Positive & Negative Logic, know they amount to the exact same thing, as long as the Rules of Logic are followed")

For your information that is Morgan's own RFC demanding that NIST implement corrections to their Reports, so that those Reports would clearly show how TV Fakery was employed in order to fool everyone.

I happened across this page

Submitted by PerpetualYnquisitive on Sun, 2007-03-25 01:26.

http://911research.wtc7.net/pentagon/analysis/compare/c130crash.html

Another bunch of steaming, bovine fecal matter spewed forth from the Hoffman Omission Commission as can be proven by this photo of a large portion of wing, on the lower, right side.
http://img163.imageshack.us/my.php?image=iranwtchj9.jpg
or this,
http://img163.imageshack.us/my.php?image=iranc130im3eb3.jpg
or these,
http://www.1001crash.com/cim.php?acc=Iran_C130&lg=2

Luckily for the Hoffman Omission Commision & many other CCTer$, their audiences are a well trained pack of Pavlovian Inductees that thoroughly enjoy having their "masters" pat them on the head.

lol

Submitted by genghis on Fri, 2007-03-23 15:32.

i love how they fail to point out that the c130 bounced off a standard single brick wall, while the 757 pierced 6 newly reinforced walls of the pentagon, when the c130 is a military plane which is likely to be stronger!!. i love their information filtering and logic bending. check this out. i made a clip about 911 truth cult brainwashing. i think you guys would like it..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T_XBDx3x3fE

TRUTH SHEEP

Do it yourself

Submitted by rick on Sun, 2007-03-25 01:14.

You can file these yourself. You do not need "credentials" other than you are a voter and citizen.

Regrettably I do not participate in the frauds such that make me swear fealty for a right so I do not vote and have no nexus with the corporation we all know as the United States of America. But, some of you might well have those voters

Jerry is partcularly interested ...

Submitted by Veronica on Sun, 2007-03-25 20:04.

... in anyone who might want to blow (even a tiny little) whistle.

This could be done by "asking a pertinent question" to obtain a correction.

Sponsor

Our Mission

Navigation

Book navigation

Popular content

All time:

Recent comments

9/11 Researchers