Multiple 9/11 ExoW Coverup:
Steven Jones also linked to Neutrino Weaponry?
Plot against Prof. Jones thickens.
Jones now possibly linked to 3-4 different exoW programs for 9/11:
Sonolumiscence, Cold Fusion Weaponry,
Neutrino Weaponry and maybe even Antimatter.
Jones either involved as "desktop advisor", political cover-up artist or indirect development.
9/11 was War of the exoWs, obviously "testing" all of them.
'Jones at Rosie' would continue the "Thermite Hangout" and improve the LooseChange/Cuban PR scam.
Iran 'threat' just a convenient smokescreen for left wing, (neo-)larouchians
and average anti-war dupes, to distract from exoW, "WW4/5" with 'Eurasia' with help of StarWars programs of U.S., Russia and China.
(see also 9/11 ExoW Cover-Up:
Top Direct Energy Insider linked to Claremont (Griffin), Los Alamos (PJones)
http://www.911researchers.com/node/347 )
by 911bloglines.com
March 30, 2007
The evidence of the use of "Directed Energy Weapons" is just the
Tip of the Iceberg.
Most obviously, any kind of additional exoW could have been 'in the mix' on 9/11,
potentially hangouting against each other, once 'detected'.
As already reported, Professor Steve(n) E. Jones worked
on Sonolumiscence (see below), one of many potential 'future energy programs',
which had been weaponized instead.
He also covered up a 'free energy' project in 1989,
which was later turned into a weaponry program as well,
at least in Asia.
Meanwhile documents prove, that the U.S. established many exoW company start-ups in time *before* 9/11,
one of them also specialized in AntiMatter Weaponry, as described below.
'Traitor' Steven Jones was furthermore guest visitor at KEK, Japan.
This institute is in "competition" with the U.S. since decades
on "neutrino weaponry" -against Nuclear Weaponry!
It is Fermilab (Chicago) VS. KEK (Tsukuba, Japan)!
PT.1
Jones and Neutrino Weaponry
Professor Steven E Jones worked at KEK
http://www.kek.jp/intra-e/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steven_E._Jones
"...He was the principal investigator for experimental Muon-catalyzed fusion from 1982 to 1991 for the U.S. Department of Energy...
Jones has also been a collaborator in several experiments, including experiments at TRIUMF (Vancouver, British Columbia), The National High Energy Laboratory, KEK (Tsukuba, Japan), and the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory at Oxford University...."
http://www.kek.jp/kek-news/vol1no2/news3.html
"...to name a few, Steven CHU, Allen MILLS Jr., Steven JONES, Donald FLEMING, Jess BREWER, Anthony ARROT and Alexander SCHENCK are the recent visitors...."
The importance of neutrino weaponry is immense,
because they could potentially destroy nuclear weaponry.
Did an additional Neutrino Weapon "Test" took place on 9/11?
Furthermore:
Was an AntiMatter Weapon responsible for the 'wipe' of the 'spire' and the "slice"
of WTC 7?
http://www.motorsportsartist.com/911truthiness/?p=68
(Photo: Cold fusion cell at the US Navy Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center San Diego (2005),
which is a big network hub contractor of SAIC, also supporting their Naval Warfare Systems.)
How many more exoW of any kind have been used on the morning of 9/11?
Current suspects:
DirectedEnergy, Thermobarics and similar mini nuke systems -later also used in Afganistan/Tora Bora, "nanoenergetics" aka superthermite ("NANOTECHNOLOGIES, Inc." (also founded during 2001), AntiMatter Weaponry, NeutrinoWeaponry, any kind of additional DirEn arrivates, Tesla/Plasma Physics/Cold Fusion, EMP etc..
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/7/5/7
Could neutrinos destroy nuclear weapons?
13 May 2003
"...Physicists at the KEK laboratory in Japan and the University of Hawaii have proposed a
What a list!
I wrote a (I thought) witty comment but it seems to have stumped the server. Maybe it never appeared . Oh well.
check out
check out also
Total411.info:
NIST petitioned on energy-weapon interest conflict
picked up at:
http://www.total411.info/2007/03/dr-wood-petitions-nist-on-energy-weapon...
Saturday, March 31, 2007
"...ARA is also at the very epicenter of the development of Directed Energy Weapons.
DEW may be the very core of ARA
StarWars in Europe
StarWars in Europe
EU wants US anti-missile defence integrated in NATO
http://www.neurope.eu/view_news.php?id=70893
3 March 2007
German Defence Minister Franz Josef Jung on March 2 said US plans for a European-based anti-missile defence system should become part of a wider NATO framework, a move which could ease current Russia
Response to hsgsj (?) from
Response to hsgsj (?) from dc911truth.org (?)
(http://www.911blogger.com/blog/783
hsgsj, whether he is a Joneshugger or not, has to be established yet, ignores that the article is about the general cover-up of exoW productions worldwide prior and after 9/11, especially also reg. "Antimatter" for the use of Space Mancraft and Space War, as clearly described in the links above.
See also
TV Video: Tapping antimatter for space travel and weaponry
http://www.krqe.com/video/expanded.asp?ID=4573 (link down)
Powered Space Transport Vehicle for Planetary Missions
http://tinyurl.com/2htcdr (http://www.niac.usra.edu/...)
Spacecraft propulsion- STAR WARS 2010
(from AI Wars (AI "Soldiers" and AI "Races")
http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Spacecraft_propulsion
Spacecraft propulsion is used to change the velocity of spacecraft and artificial satellites,
or in short, to provide delta-v...
...Newer geo-orbiting spacecraft are starting to use electric propulsion for north-south stationkeeping..."
At one point in the article i speculated about a possible additional scenario of a "test", but didn't refer to the complete buildings, but theoretically one floor or basement for computer simulation analysis.
I also agree that Neutrino Weaponry are not effective for "collapses" in the style of 911.
I still would refer here to DirEN as main suspects.
Still unexplained however is also the destruction of the spire, which could be linked to another exoW, i.e. Antimatter.
hsgsj even quoted me correctly:
"additional" means additional and not only.
It was about "all in the mix".
Fact is successful Neutrino tests took place before,
at the KEK and Fermilab.
Why noone wants to confront Prof.Jones about this, is a mystery to me.
Fact is also, Antimatter weaponry works too and is already in official production.
http://www.911blogger.com/blog/783
Submitted by hsgsj on Sat, 03/31/2007 - 10:48am.
"...For the record, Tesla was a genius who invented the transformer as well as electric motors and generators. These were the foundations of the modern AC power grid. He did other things as well, like radio control. His experiments centered around the cutting edge technological developments of electrodynamics at the time. However, the progression of scientific understanding has long surpassed his work by about 60 or 70 years, and many other scientific geniuses have come and gone.
So, to answer the question from the article you linked to:
"Did an additional Neutrino Weapon 'Test' took place on 9/11?"
The answer is an emphatic no.
Well, it is possible that a *test* took place, but it is physically impossible that neutrinos had anything to do with the collapse of the towers, so would make such a test an exceedingly stupid thing to do (chopping down the tower with a spoon would be more likely). It is impossible that neutrinos destroyed the towers, because neutrinos have very near a zero percent chance of interacting with *any* of the matter which existed in the towers..."
propulsion query
One thing I could never understand, is HOW spacecraft propulsion actually works. Space is a vacuum, so what does the propulsion push against? Enlightnen me someone! But dont go all warpy on me :-)
Thrust
The thrust pushes against the spacecraft, so they go opposite directions.
Thrust
Imagine that you're out in space and holding a bowling ball or a pumpkin. You can start movement in any direction you please by throwing the pumpkin in the opposite direction.
Do not ask me about the ethics of throwing pumpkins in space.
You're in Outer Space with Greg Jenkins, Steven Jones, and David Ray Griffin. You've only got two pumpkins, and all four of you are drifting dangerously away from your spacecraft. What do you do?
Fred
Griffin, Jones, Jenkins, a Pumpkin, and a Bowling Ball
You whip out your microwave beam weapon, zap the pumpkin, which explodes all over David Ray Griffin. "That's for preaching one-world government!" you say, but he can't hear you in the vacuum of space.
Next you implant a small cold fusion device inside the bowling ball, and push it towards Steven Jones. It is timed to explode when it reaches him, and the irony is clear.
This causes you to tumble even farther from the spacecraft, so you activate your hand-held anti-matter accelerator, cruise safely back over to the hatch.
As you climb in to the craft and think about something for dinner, you remember Greg Jenkins. Panic is all over Jenkins' face, as he drifts farther out into the infinite black sea.
"See, I told you such technology exisits!", you say.
But he can't hear you.
Lol
Thanks Ace. I haven't laughed that hard for a while.
Fred
Star Wars- next phase
"StarWars", which was secretly relaunched under Clinton prior 9/11 (between 1998/99 with the "Project Trailblazer" contracts) and basically never stopped, is already confirmed in Europe and a huge political Issue over there.
Furthermore active Satellite StarWars Tests took place by China.
US claims that China has used lasers to attack satellites
http://www.janes.com/defence/air_forces/news/jdw/jdw061016_1_n.shtml
16 October 2006
Check out also
http://www.asiafinest.com/forum/lofiversion/index.php/t70689.html
China research on anti-matter weapons ?
The only serious "9/11 Truthling" on that topic appears to be Webster Tarpley, but he's distracting with the smokescreen of Iran.
The goal of 9/11 was to get new budgets for future technology and future weaponry, leading into WW4/5 with Russia, China.
http://www.911bloglines.com/node/61
It should be only a matter of months, if not weeks until U.S. will politicize "Star Wars" also *here* and not in their proxy states.
That debate will also include the mainstream PR of Directed Energy Weaponry.
9/11 Truthlings are already complicit by allowing this pending world war to happen, together with the infiltrated Anti-War Movement.
I'm more than happy to lay out my miltary research at any time on Webster's show.
If he doesn't want to talk with me any more, or scared to get fired, i suggest Tarpley should be interviewed by Total911, who also does know a lot about the political cover-up of exoW.
However my theory is that Tarpley (who's leading the neo-larouchies in Europe, i.e. Italy, Germany, Austria) actually downsizes the use of StarWars on purpose, because LaRouche itself helped brokering it in the 80s.
Maybe Tarpley wants Russia/China to succeed in this War? ;
see also
'Bird Flu': From psyOP and population control to "WW4"
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1515
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1515.40
...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRIC
BRIC is a term used to refer to the combination of
Brazil, Russia, India, and China.
Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050 (2003)
Goldman Sachs predicts China and India, respectively, to be the dominant global suppliers of manufactured goods and services while Brazil and Russia would become similarly dominant as suppliers of raw materials..
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?1515.50
Mon Nov 27 2006
West must prepare for Chinese, Indian dominance: Wolfensohn
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061126/bs_afp/australiachinaindiaeconomygr...
Sun Nov 26, 5:32 AM ET
SYDNEY (AFP) - Western nations must prepare for a future dominated by China and India, whose rapid economic rise will soon fundamentally alter the balance of power, former
World Bank chief James Wolfensohn has warned...
http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?4207
Peter Brookes, Heritage Foundation lays out War between U.S. vs. China/Taiwan
http://www.nypost.com/seven/03262007/postopinion/opedcolumnists/the_next...
March 26, 2007
The next threats
China-Taiwan: While the chance of a conflict across the Taiwan Strait is remote, China's defense buildup and recent Taiwanese rhetoric about "independence" keeps this possibility at the front of war planners' minds.
Fortunately, a Chinese attack on Taiwan must navigate the 100-mile-wide Taiwan Strait. China doesn't have the air- and sea-lift capability to support a full-scale invasion of Taiwan - so it would have to rely on ballistic missiles and sea and air power.
The U.S. objective would be to protect the political status quo, using air and naval forces to break Chinese naval blockades, counter air or missile strikes and vanquish sea- or airborne invasion forces as they cross the strait...
Is China's Military a Threat?
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1595893,00.html
Mar. 05, 2007
"...Two months ago, China for the first time tested successfully an anti-satellite missile, but then was mum about it publicly for almost two weeks, despite being pressed for information by not only Washington but Moscow, Tokyo and several other foreign governments....
...most defense planners in the U.S. still believe the primary strategic objective for China's defense spending is to deter the U.S. from intervening in any crisis over Taiwan...."
"China Threat" reached already U.S.Comedy:
'Frenemy' -The Colbert Report
http://tinyurl.com/yq258q
"...Colbert Report: The Pulse: China Stephen answers the public's questions, such as: why do the Chinese play checkers with marbles?..."
http://www.danwei.org/foreign_media_on_china/china_specials_colbert_repo...
[incl. video]
February 15, 2007
"...Stephen Colbert, one of the hosts of spoof American news program The Daily Show has been doing a series of segments about China. The first one defines China as a "frenemy" of the United States..."