There is some additional irony in what Andrew Lowe Watson had to say.

We are using :video: as a medium to reject the manipulations on TV but apparently use their *same* multi-layer technique ;)

Video was always either fast or slow motion edit.

The audience is getting used to every kind of BPM,
because the neuro system of the brain is theoretically always able to expand and reflect an information :overkill: or so called TMI (too much information).

In the long run we might end up in a trap.
I cannot speak for Gerard Holmgren, but he would maybe argue, that by using the same tools, we merchandize the media perp world.

Therefore a profane 'TV Critique' isn't *my* general meta-message.
I believe instead in the reaction between bottle neck effect and specific magnetism of media in general.

And my hope is still the Intelligenzia which seems to have become a rare species, instead replaced with Orwellian truthlings, onesided bloglings and general Media dumblings.

I worked at TV also for 10-12 years. I distinguish between the medium TV and the content, constantly.

My friends back in Europe and then U.S. treated a 'television job' as something *special*, but i always treated it as a general job, like everything else i worked at the same time. I always had multiple jobs at the same time, sometimes even up to 8-10 different jobs in the same week, with complete opposite elements.

During 1994/95 i started my own Internet Company, together with a friend. We both came from the party scene, so we logically started to work with music and video.

Working with video is a different medium.

I treated *TV* always as a machine. I criticize more the teletubby world in the head of the audience, who seems to believe everything what they see on TV.

I never did that. I always knew it's BS and wondered why people *believe* in it.

I'm a movie fan. I also watched TV Shows, especially Soap Operas. Comedy etc...

TV itself became more boring with the introduction of the 'reality tv ' concept.

I am sure most people still don't even know what's really behind this concept.

It's a complete OP where nothing is real.
The original idea was actually BigBrother TV, then with season 2 they invented actors for any kind of 'voyeurism concepts', actually inspired by the 'peeping tom'/'bus bang' sex genre, which always used actors to distract from the few 'real' amateurs.

BBTV Season 1, especially in europe (produced by a latino telecommunication company and dutch bilderberg alliance) was very authentic, while all second seasons, incl. in U.S. had been completely scripted, they used actors, almost everything was staged, then re-edited for TV and had nothing to do with the original idea of "voyeurism" any longer.

In 2001 i had an investigation on the rigged season 2 of BB, while i was on a canadian BBTV fan message board. I was accused as a "conspiracy theorist" while i was doing that.

(My nickname was 'ewing2001' while i was 'testpod69' when i was working for PSEUDO TV and We Live In Public, maybe *the* pre- 9/11 art anti-Orwellian projects at all, in the history of dotcom hype. It was always clear to me we would reflect and criticize cyber fascism, nothing else.
http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.11/luvvy_pr.html )

I was less obsessed with political correctness than to actually figure out how the 'trickery' works.
I was basically amused, while the BB fans felt insulted and reacted very aggressive and even hostile.

They accused me as an "enemy of the show", why i still loved it, especially for the scammery.

Then during the highlights of my investigation, 9/11 happened, while i was on this message board.

I wrote 22 hours in a row about 9/11 off topic, which was allowed by the moderator, then i finally went asleep.
Yet another thread started of mine at the same time was called "the investigation continues..."

I didn't believe any second in the official story of 9/11 and the second collapse looked to me on that morning like a "controlled demolition" on purpose, because i thought they had evacuated all people. The first collapse looked surreal to me too and i met some weeks later Jeff King aka plaguepuppy which was refreshing to see someone on the same page.

I was maybe fooled for 1 hour into the distraction with some patsies, but nothing added up anyway.

Noone seems to recall anymore, that already the first version of the 9/11 plotline ended with contradictive ends in Westin Hotel.

I also saw suddenly a special footage feed from the second 'hit' (not broadcasted live!) on either CNN or CBS, which was some "exlusive" CNN-amateur footage 'video' from an 'unknown amateur team'.
( http://killtown.911review.org/2nd-hit.html #17)

I immediately thought this was a quickly produced "redramatization" with an animated CGI plane (though i didn't think of that word at that time).

However the 'trickery' didn't bother me as much, because i believed in the real plane that day, and i considered the 'trickery' as a typical american thingy.

Therefore i was thinking about a 'remote controlled plane' pretty soon, *because* of that dramatization. (See the irony of that logic?)

The clip itself bugged me for 5.x years, because it isn't included in any live archive of CNN at all.

It is for sure available at some internet archives and you can see the "replays" on web.archive.

But *this* clip is what i was talking about in my Interview with 'radical pragmatist'.
The interview was sampled at 'ABC Antimatter' Mix. (greenscreened by Fred!).

This cgi-"redramatization" (with the rotating effect and butter entry!) bugged me for at least 1 year before i could talk with anyone about that, incl. the first scientific researchers on controlled demolition.

(Addendum: Meanwhile i know i wasn't alone.
During 2005/06 i learned that Joseph Keith, ex 9/11phsyics.org had the same impression also immediately, even with/during at the live feed. He saw it on a local FOX 11 station, while i was more fascinated with the non-live footage of CNN, which seemed to me completely contradict the live feed of local ABC, which didn't burn into my brain *at all*.)

During 2002 i was hacked. My video tools had been bombed back into stone age. My windows system settings went on 8bit.

I wasn't even able to listen to music for at least 2 years because i had not enough money to buy a new computer or fix it.

I still believe this was a professional hack, not done by script kiddies. It was done to delay my video skills for particular reasons.

(There wasn't by the way not any single project,
where i was involved, which wasn't hacked to0.
Globalfreepress was maybe hacked 6-8 times and team8plus was usually jammed every few months.)

During late 2002/03 i spoke with Scott Loughrey (9/11 Science and Justice Alliance) about the possibility of animated planes and TV Fakery. We used a different slang that time, since we weren't informed enough about simple CGI technique.

It was Scott who went online first with his website at 911hoax.com and a clear message which would rule out or contradict any other 'airborne' technique.

The sabotage against this message continued.

During 2005 i finally could continue with a new notebook, sponsored by one of the most talented but less known 9/11 researchers in this movement.

I relaunched my video work by finally comparing all 2nd hit footage again. At that point i was already convinced that 80% was faked since i watched some smaller clips on my office computers or at INN World Report, where i used to work too.

It is my strongest belief that we cannot tolerate a free pass to the media.

If people do not realize that even most political talk shows use actors! (Bill O 'Reilly etc..) then there is something really wrong among the audience.

I'm still a big fan of Jerry Springer because i always enjoyed it and *because i knew* it was fake and they used actors.

They use the same actors at COURT TV.
I knew it because i worked for TV. I also worked for the european version of COURT TV. Nothing of these cases and persons are authentic at all.

I reject the idiocy of the audience. I still have no problems with the 'machine' TV.
I also support the 'Tivo Concept'.

However i am bored from tv shows at all since 2-3 years and almost don't watch or "monitor" anymore.

I pushed the idea of replacing the mainstream media reg. 9/11 since early 2002 by producing "ShadowGovernment TV",
which aired 3 seasons on local NY public access.

There is no good soap opera anymore. Science Fiction also almost died after 9/11. Docudramas are the modern form of complete brainwash. There is no enjoyable comedy.
Every Talk show is bad. Night Talk dried out 2 years after 9/11.
Jon Stewart isn't funny because he's a gatekeeper.
John Colbert *is* funny because he represents the flagwaver.

There are some good satires on the various 'Cartoon Networks', but hard to find. Maybe SouthPark ruined the spirit of the last good satires as well. I think it all dried out. British Humor was always more productive imo and it still is.

Zucker/Abrahams and those who got inspired of them sold out instead.

And where is the (9/11-)truthling anti-comedy?

We do actually work on this ;
We reveal their cartoon heads in a cartoon!

*TV* as a machine is meanwhile dead since YOUTUBE.

What the information character depends, i'm getting all news faster from the Internet incl. their spin.

Blogosphere and VideoMashups will bury the end of the TV Machine or might turn it into something else,
in the worst but very realistic scenario it will end up as an extended EEG-module for manipulated brain/nano chemistry and interactive games, see also "AI Wars (AI "Soldiers" and AI "Races").
http://www.911bloglines.com/node/61

I never enjoyed fake tv news. CNN, MSNBC etc.. are the same fraudster, like FOX is and PBS is the nightmare version of gatekeeper TV.

That is why '9/11 TV Fakery' will be my No.1 Element in these video mashUPs.