Naudet Fakery: Keeping It Simple

Submitted by John Gault on Wed, 2007-04-11 14:38

It has come to my attention that many researcher well-versed in the

John Gault's blog

Login or register to post comments

1279 reads

911bloglines.com (04/11)

Submitted by ewing2001 on Wed, 2007-04-11 18:39.

911bloglines.com (04/11)
http://www.911bloglines.com/aggregator/sources/1
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001

* New 9/11 TV Fakery DVD for Rosie, ny911 Protest cancelled, News Roundup etc... (04/11)
* 9/11 DNA: Alleged "Flight11" Passenger identified though Flight didn't exist
* BSReg: "This is your brain on TV "
* Genghis6199: "boeing vs. building"
* British Morecambe Today about Hangout Movie "PressforTruth"
* Webfairy (Video): "Peter Strid's" Second Hit No-Plane Video
* 911blogger: Jon Gold continues to get voted down
* Psychic dedicates Websites for Rosie O'Donnell
* MySpace axes Killtown
* Portland IndyMedia: Shayler "No-Planes" and CGI Intro for Newbies
* PRAVDA: 9/11 Media Cover-Up, Attacks not done by Terrorists
* Video Interviews (Irvine, CA): Rodriguez, Tarpley, Thottam (9/11 Truth LA)
* MattsMillion: Contribution for LC Movie Trailer
* Total911 Video: Rosie curious on 9/11 exo-weaponry
* BsReg: "Lemonade"
* Rosie props Judy Wood + Heavy Watergate on Blog
* Vermont Easter Bunny goes 9/11 Activism
* Latest "9/11 DNA" Company linked to Giuliani
* The next Griffin? - The Coloradoan about David Deane
* Fairbanks Daily: "Improbable Collapse revisits 9/11 Conspiracies
* New 9/11 '11th'-Action site 911yardsign.com sponsored by "ArmoryInfo" and 'Healers'
* Orwellian Truthling Fights and Retire Threats: Jon Gold vs. Casseia, "Col." Sparks
* 05/26: NWITruth announced Conference
* Steven "Los Alamos/KEK Japan" Jones wants Anti-Walmart Action
* 04/11 Sydney: 911oz.com announced Australian 9/11 Truthling Protest
* Chico911truth.org (CA) presents Griffin Grovelling Video
* Xenomorph911: Compilation of falling Building 7 clips
* Genghis6199 Updates at YouTube
* Satire: Haupt, Siegel, Hoffman "invited" for '9/11 Idol'
* Boston Herald- more papers pick up "JFK"-O'Reilly-9/11 Rosie Columns
* BSReg: The Long War - UAV's Black Operations
* PeggyCarter/Killtown: The 9/11 "Ghostplane"/Whitehall Overlay
* 9/11 Mysteries accepted for Belgium Film Festival - April 19-22
* 9/11"Truth" doesn't matter (Anti Matter ABC Remix)
* 9/11 Scholars link TV Fakery Video MashUps

Silence means security

Submitted by John Gault on Thu, 2007-04-12 04:30.

Silence means approval.

"Things are getting more politically again regarding the cover-up on the evidence on 9/11 TV Fakery." -Nico

Keep us posted :)

Update -9/11 DNA: Alleged

Submitted by ewing2001 on Thu, 2007-04-12 06:26.

The recent 'interest' of both MSM and OnlineJournal reg. 'flight11' is yet another hint of how the media perps try to distract from the rising underground success of 9/11 TV Fakery
regarding alleged 'UA175'.

It's getting now extremely fishy since one DNA company is linked to "FreshKills" Guiliani ;
Keep in mind that at one point the Naudet Brothers had been very close to the LC Crew (see older blog at http://www.911researchers.com/blog/9)

Update -9/11 DNA: Alleged "Flight11" Passenger (Qantas Link) identified though Flight didn't exist
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3224

Could you explain...

Submitted by John Gault on Thu, 2007-04-12 18:34.

Well put John

Submitted by rick on Thu, 2007-04-12 18:52.

Where can one get an original? I heard there are different versions. That the VHS has different footage? I really hate looking and working from fuzzy video.

Thanks

Rick, I found...

Submitted by John Gault on Thu, 2007-04-12 19:49.

it is available on amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/11-Filmmakers-Commemorative-Tony-Benatatos/dp/B000...

My version is labeled (on the DVD) 2002/color/129 min/...

The copyright is: 2001 Goldfish Pictures, Inc.

I purchased it in 2003.

I believe the "different versions" are the one shown on TV which included the Deniro intro and the "released version" which does not. I am not aware of any different versions of the actual footage, but if you know of any, please post. Thanks. Hope this helps.

Ray Ubinger now also most

Submitted by ewing2001 on Fri, 2007-04-13 01:17.

Ray Ubinger now also most active at http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=64633#64633

"Jules Naudet's First Plane Shot was Staged"

I need a copy of the dvd

Submitted by Coffinman on Fri, 2007-04-13 03:49.

I need a copy of the dvd and to improve my video skills before I can comment, but it is evident that more people need to develop these skills in order to comment.
Webfairy has cited differences in each field as proof of authenticity.
Are there no other analysts who can comment on that, and verify or not the footage on that basis?
This is an important point and needs to be addressed.
Can nobody else contribute to this?
Coffinman

On the authentication of the Naudet footage frame content.

Submitted by theSaiGirl on Mon, 2007-06-25 00:44.

Deja vu all over again on this one.

Here I have dug up an old, old discussion about the Naudet footage that got quite testy over at 911insidejobbers.

This was a long, long argument over just the Naudet footage question, where WF specified some formal testing criteria (albeit somewhat heuristically) typically used to distinguish "fake" footage from authentic.

From Webfairy back in January of 2006, here are the details...

===============================================
The objects in the first hit are different in every frame, unlike
cartoonies that come in duplicate or even triplicate as a matter of course.
The cartoonie planes have distain for perspective, staying the same size
as they hippityhop to oblvion.
The first hit objects respond to perspective, looking larger while they
are closer to the camera and getting smaller as they move away from the
camera, exactly like any real object.
The dive from SOME FOOTAGE IS FAKED to ALL FOOTAGE IS FAKED reminds me
of Carlson and his one-note universe made of 737s and napalm.

http://missilegate.com has a beautyshot of each frame of the first hit
sequence.
There is a plain view, a view showing find-edges, a video sharpened with
Focus Magic sharpening algorithm, and a view with the focus magic and
find images blended.
http://missiolegate.com/video.htm
Eash one of these has been recreated as a full-motion video, nothing
missing, nothing added, nothing taken out.
While a still can be futzed in any of a number of ways, a video has it's
own signature of authenticity in it's continuity.

This is why the 5 farked Pentagon Art Frames fell short.
They had no continuity until later, when they were resized, a frame
replaced with nore sensible coloration,
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/comparison.htm
and interframes made blending two frames together to give an impression
of being video.
http://thewebfairy.com/911/pentagon/voila.htm

The first hit has remained unchanged since I first noticed something
peculair and made my first set of enlargements.
http://thewebfairy.com/whatzit

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/911InsideJobbers/message/5936

re: Technical authentication of the Naudet footage

Submitted by theSaiGirl on Mon, 2007-06-25 00:49.

This is emphatically NOT "Joe Sixpack" stuff.

Not exactly "rocket science" either, but still requires some detailed technical knowledge and long-term experience handling the various kinds of digital (or analog) media, offsetting for artifacts of compression, etc.

It's highly specialized and dependent on intimate knowledge of the capabilities and limitations of the current state of "fakery" technology.

And since it pertains specifically to the character of image media, maybe out of Judy Wood's league as well ..... ?

Sponsor

Our Mission

Navigation

Book navigation

Popular content

All time:

Recent comments

9/11 Researchers