Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
2 weeks 6 days ago - what?
2 weeks 6 days ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
3 weeks 8 hours ago - depends on settings
3 weeks 22 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
3 weeks 23 hours ago - Never saw the comment
3 weeks 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
3 weeks 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
3 weeks 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
3 weeks 2 days ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
3 weeks 2 days ago
Re: John Kerry
October Surprise conspirator ... Mena cocaine cover-up conspirator ... Maximum-security federal penitentiary.
softballing swiftboat
Softball questions from AJ "moonies"
Hey John, how do you respond to the obvious, that the US military carried out the attacks on 9/11, as a pretext for a generation long war in the ME and the Israelification of Iraq?
Don't Fall For The WTC7 Red Herring
Why would Kerry make such a statement???
DON'T GET DISTRACTED FROM THE DIRECTED ENERGY WEAPON EVIDENCE
Is WTC 7 a Red Herring???
http://www.911researchers.com/node/323
Strange questions, strange reactions
It's hard to believe that Kerrry's so out of touch that he hasn't heard about 9/11 and the various "conspiracy theories". It's also surprising that he says something about a "wall being in danger". That's pretty random.
It seems to me that Kerry may just ad-libbing based on the question that was asked, and parroting back the word "controlled".
It's too bad they're hitting him with the "official" alternative explanation rather than anything damning. Loyal Bonesman Kerry probably wouldn't say or do anything that might get his fellow clubman George into any trouble. And I doubt very much that those good Yalies the Clintons are going to say or do anything that would get another Yalie into trouble.
Maybe the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy is now so vast that it has room inside for Kerry, Bush, Bill and Hillary too. They certainly don't seem to be trying too hard to protect America from terrorism, that's for sure.
Fred
Kerry won't help
Expect some sort of "clarification" by a Kerry spokesperson shortly. Something like, "Mr. Kerry was mistaken and thought the questioner was referring to WTC6, which was in danger of damaging the slurry wall, and which was demolished in a controlled fashion. Mr. Kerry feels that the proper scientific authorities have investigated 9/11, and accepts their findings."
Even though it was Jonesian truthlings at the bookstore, it was still good to see them there. We need more of that.
...this is just the typical
...this is just the typical prisonplanet style.
Sensationalizing a harmless slip, which originally was less dramatic.
Video: Austin 9/11 Truth/PrisonPlanet
-Kerry refers to WTC 7 as "controlled manner"
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3309
check out also this:
http://www.911blogger.com/node/8063
Kerry was talking about a "WALL", not WTC7!
Submitted by Dem Bruce Lee Styles on Mon, 04/23/2007 - 5:08pm.
Error of the Ways
It seems that sensationalism and capitalism thrive no matter what the occasion. When real evidence is not available stretching the taffy accessible is the only way. Perfect politicians are perfect puppets and chameleons changing colors and flow in accord with the direction the funds flow. A really good politico must face you and convince you they care in a few seconds, never giving a damn