Using the latest in cointelpro disinformation translation technology, the recent posting by Jim Fetzer and Sophia has been converted to reveal the honest thoughts of these 911truth flag-bearers. Infiltration by cointelpro agents has to start somewhere and the double talk gives them away every time once it is translated from "truth-ling speak" into English. Get ready to find out "the rest of the story".

Submitted by Jim Fetzer on Wed, 2007-06-06 21:01.
Sofia has sent me an explanation of how she proceeded in putting together "9/11 Mysteries".

Translation - (it took her over six months to come up with even this lame response to Rick exposing the disinfo in 911 Mysteries)

I believe she did the best she could with what she had to work with and that she has now figured out how to do it even better.

Translation - (Steven and I agreed to not talk about the seven laws of science that prove treason, fraud and murder and Sophia managed to avoid them altogether in 911 Mysteries with the help of some slick Hollywood editing that should keep the faithful pacified)

I see no basis for the kind of slams she has taken or the kind of trashing I have received from many on this list. I think enough is enough. Enough!

Translation - (I see no cointepro, hear no cointelpro and speak no cointelpro disinfo...)

Regarding the "distortions" or the many things I have allegedly "done wrong" with Rick Siegel's video footage, of no small significance was the fact that the "911 Eyewitness" video was very difficult to work with.

Translation - (Cutting out seven laws of science and replacing them with Eric the anti-Semitic was difficult but one year and $100,000 later - thanks to support from Eric's uncle Rupert - we managed to put those worms back in the can.)

It was unfortunately not put together in a coherent fashion,

Translation - (Real-time raw video evidence is hard to distort so we had to show the smoke rising twice from the base of the North tower and give different theories of bombs and thermite to confuse people as to what was really going on there.)

is overly long and tedious, and the narration is mechanical and frankly bizarre.

Translation - (it was so damn right on the money we had to replace the north tower collapse audio with police sirens and hope nobody would notice and then cut out before the spire appears.)

The blue, unnatural color of the footage is apparently due to Rick's faulty camera settings (or so the pros tell me), in addition to which, Rick has no real footage of the South Tower falling.

Translation - (Purple haze...I'll say anything to distract readers from the fact that he captured all the incriminating helicopter flights in real time and even testified about seeing the winch operator prior to the flashing infrared beam.)

It is blocked by the North Tower, so when the South Tower went down, all you see in "Eyewitness" is a lot of smoke and ash.

Translation - (hopefully nobody will pay attention to Chopper #4 as long as we cut it out in Mysteries and steal the spotlight away from 911 Eyewitness with a PR blitz supported by all our "friends" in the 911truth movement)

"Nonetheless, I and many people feel that the content of the "Eyewitness" video is worthwhile, and even unique.

Translation - (I've got to give something back here to maintain our cover with the faithful who realize Rick Siegel is the Zapruder of 911.)

"To "show" the public at a glance or in a few seconds what "Eyewitness" is all about was not an easy task, given all these problems.

Translation - (I had to avoid the audio signature indicating bombs prior to collapse and seismic spikes that indicate micro-nukes were used.)

"My own narration tells the viewer that Rick's camera's sound meter caught explosions within the towers as they went down.

Translation - (I had to distract the faithful from the fact that Rick's camera caught huge explosions within the towers BEFORE they went down.)

"Then, as an illustration of the concept, the narration says: "Here is the South Tower record."

Translation - (This clip lists "WTC2 pre-collapse explosions". WTC2 has just previously fallen to the ground and now only WTC1 remains. It will not fall for another 30 minutes, however, the next picture and comment indicate that immediately following the pre-collapse explosions listed.

35:33 "Then the building came down" the narrator tells us. Meanwhile the north tower segment from a completely different timeframe in the original program, is incorrectly located here.

1. This misrepresents the north tower WTC1, to be the south tower, WTC2.
2. This misrepresents the list of WTC2 pre-collapse explotions as directly responsible for the collapse of
WTC1.
3. This misrepresents the time at which the WTC1 collapse occurred because WTC2 time-codes were visible onscreen only seconds earlier.

"Why did we show that one?

Translation - (it was the only one we could easily misrepresent to confuse viewers. I hope it's still working.)

Because the North Tower "record" was a graph created in video format (very long and drawn out),

Translation - (must try to avoid showing the three massive explosions firefighters talked about BEFORE the north tower started to fall.)

whereas the South Tower record was a simple list, showing time codes for the explosions.

Translation - (so then we could splice in a shot of the north tower falling out of context)

At a glance, this was easier for the viewer to comprehend than the graph. Now that we had announced the thesis (I'm talking about "Mysteries" here and our viewers), the result had to be shown -- the tower falling.

Translation - ("Mystery" is exactly what we created by narrating "Then the building came down" and showing the north tower collapse.)

HOWEVER, Rick has no decent shot of the South Tower coming down. Just smoke. What you see in "Eyewitness" when the South Tower falls is the North Tower still standing in front of it. The audience would have said, "What? Nothing happened!"

Translation - (so we asked our slick Hollywood editor to cut out the real-time footage with news radio commentary during the south tower collapse, start with the list of pre-explosions and then splice in the north tower collapsing out of context)

Therefore, if we were going to show the result of the thesis and had only one collapse to show (North Tower) and only one list of explosions to show (South Tower), the narration line had to be: "Then the BUILDING fell," and we showed Rick's shot of the North Tower coming down to demonstrate that after the internal explosions (which pertained to each tower), the building(s) each came down. It was the best we could do with the limitations of the original work.

Translation - (this long convoluted excuse is the best we could come up with to cover up our disinfo that had fooled 99% of the faithful up 'til now. I hope it's still working.)

In the January 2007 edition, I figured out a slightly different way to put it.

Translation - (I had been ignoring Rick's cease and desist request since October and wasn't about to give up the Golden Goose just yet.)

The narration is: "Here is each tower's record" and we show both the list for the South Tower and the graph of the North Tower.

Translation - (we replicated 40,000 DVDs of the original version against Rick's protests and we're not about to stop so this was a compromise)

Because the North Tower graph video contains the audio of the collapse as well, that element delivers the conclusion or result (for and in the viewer's mind) -- that the tower(s) came down.

Translation - (with that convoluted explanation hopefully nobody will notice that I don't explain the big whopper at 45:39 where the close-up filter shot is used for the second time of smoke between waterfront buildings. Narration: "and white smoke appeared at the base of the building. Would this be aluminum oxide, the byproduct of a thermite reaction?"

Problems,
1. The south tower's 80th floor impact zone, at approximately 9:00 am, is followed directly by the north tower at approximately 10:30 a.m. showing smoke rising from the ground between buildings. 2. The narration "and" connects the two with a continuous line of thought.
3. Continuity with the first time this clip is viewed at 33:50 is destroyed because the rising smoke is attributed to a large explosion in the original content.
4. This creates confusion in the mind of the viewer and replaces the original explosion with the holy grail of "thermite did it folks".
5. The combination of confusion and conflict will make understanding this event very difficult for the first time viewer and could be categorized in psychological terms as "disinformation".

In summary, "Eyewitness" is neither an easy video to watch or to work with.

Translation - (distorting a real-time, intact segment of history is no easy task but slick MTV editing saved the day for cointelpro)

However, it is an important piece of the 9/11 story and deserves to be promoted and circulated.

Translation - (look no further than Avatar's merchant site and avoid 911EW's information website and evidence tour with email-able clips)

Inclusion of this material in "Mysteries" was for two reasons -- to promote Blue Star Media Group's video sales and increase its exposure and to provide the public with another effective piece of 9/11 explosion evidence.

Translation - (With the help of "friends" in the movement we could: (A) get top billing for Mysteries as the only demolition doc worthy of watching, (B) bury those pesky seven laws of science along with Zapruder Rick's chopper #4 rescue testimony, (C) neutralize 911Eyewitness' public impact for good and (D) watch those fools starve for thinking they could expose what really happened on 9.11.)

Sofia