Our Mission

Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 Research resource logo

Navigation

Book navigation

Popular content

Recent comments

9/11 Researchers

What's wrong with this picture?

Jim Fetzer's picture
Submitted by Jim Fetzer on Mon, 2007-06-11 17:14

Rick Siegel spends endless time and effort attacking Sofia, who produced "9/11 Mysteries", me, who founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth, and Jerry Leaphart, who guided the "Requests for Correction" submissions to NIST, while completely ignoring the San Diego Grand Jury fiasco stage-managed by Don Paul and Jim Hoffman and the st911.org submission to NIST, which, for inexplicable reasons, has never been archived on the official government web site. I would suggest that, unlike the attacks on Sofia, me and Jeffy, who are doing what we can to reveal truths and expose falsehoods about 9/11, these other efforts appear intended to do the opposite. No doubt, Sofia, Jerry and I make our share of mistakes, but does anyone seriously believe that our mistakes are even remotely comparable to the San Diego Grand Jury fiasco, for example? Rick has made his points about Sofia's film over and over, like a broken record, as though it were the most important issue of our time! I have explained why I do not believe her work warrants these attacks. There are real issues that deserve real time and effort, but they are not those that are taking center stage. I would encourage everyone with a serious interest to ask themselves, "What's wrong with this picture?"

Did dubious docs indeed docket dubious 9/11 doc?
11 June 2007, total911.info, total911
http://www.total411.info/2007/06/did-dubious-docs-indeed-docket-dubious....

San Diego Hopes 9/11 Grand Jury Indictments Might Some Day Be Made
[Editor's note: Were prior reports of a "verdict" false and misleading?]
http://911grandjuryinfo.homestead.com/SanDiego911GrandJuryIndictmentsRep...

Historic Result From San Diego Citizens' Grand Jury
On The Crimes Of September 11, 2001 In New York City
15 May 2007, stj911.org, Don Paul
http://stj911.org/paul/SDCGJ_HistoricResults.html

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
rick's picture

911 Clown On Parade!

Need anyone say more?

Notice it is now Jerry, Sophia and Jimbo?? The new 911 mysteries team!

Go Jimbo, Go!

Killtown's picture

Jim, Sophia fabricated the audio on Rick's original footage

That is DECEPTION. It also looks like they obscured the helicopter.

Sophia needs to take '911 Mysteries' off the market immediately and explain why she fabricated the audio track over Rick's footage.

Fred's picture

Hey, Fetzer, Can I just fake some data and get a PhD and fries?

Have you gone mad? Are you insane? Is someone blackmailing you?

To the extent that 9/11 was about anything, it was about showing fake videos on TV to create the illusion that foreigners attacked us.

Now you're defending someone who steals a REAL video which debunks the hoax, and then modifies it to make it FAKE.

Why would you do such a thing? Lack of integrity? Intellectual dishonesty? Money problems? Fear of exposure? Love?

What could possibly motivate such bizarre and unethical behavior? An intense hatred of America and a desire participate in the murder of New Yorkers? Revenge?

You've got some explaining to do.

Fred

rick's picture

Fetzer gets deeper!


----- Original Message -----
From: jfetzer @ XXX.XXX.com

"You are such chicken-shits and intellectual cowards you can't even provide my complete statement but have to take part of a sentence out of context! This is a nice example of the shoddy shits who are wasting all this time
on pointless attacks against those who are doing more than they are to promote 9/11 truth. What's wrong with this picture? Congratulations on demonstrating that you have no scruples. You are truly a despicable lot.
" James Fetzer

This because I asked Jerry this on our "big shooter email list":

"This just in

"Rick Siegel spends endless time and effort attacking Sofia, who produced "9/11 Mysteries", me, who founded Scholars for 9/11 Truth, and Jerry Leaphart," Jim Fetzer

Jerry? Where is this coming from? That last message was an attack? Is Fetzer drinking too much? What is causing these hallucinations?

Are you now pulled into the new team? Are you supposed to be on my "hit" list? Cause I did not see it "yet". I imagine this is Fetzer laying groundwork for something that should have happened but did not yet? My spending hours attacking you. or even minutes?

Rick"

I don't think that is out of context? I think Fetzer is trying to obscure other things claiming they are more important than his lies and Sophia's. I think he is trying to say I should spend time on Sand in Diego rather than show the shit here I know about. Hey! Jim! I am busy, you cover San Diego. After I am done with you and the mysteries I will look at it. Right now, I got shit in my targets, plenty wth you alone!

Please note the incredible example of "irony" in Fetzer's moral indignation

ewing2001's picture

Attacks against Audio-Fakery Supporter Jim Fetzer increased

Attacks against Audio-Fakery Supporter Jim Fetzer increased
June 11, 2007
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3577

By ewing2001

Attacks against Audio-Fakery Supporter Jim Fetzer increased
picked up at:
http://www.911researchers.com/node/575
Submitted by rick on Mon, 2007-06-11

...

see also:
911 Mysteries Part II

Ningen's picture

Decorum

I want college professors that speak in public about 9/11 to behave in a dignified, scholarly manner.

Fred's picture

Integrity

I second that, Ningen.

I'd like them to denounce fake videos and share real ones, too.

Fred

rick's picture

Funny Fetzer

I am wondering if the citizens court in Sand Diego meant so much to Fetzer why he did not speak out? His ultimate intelligence seems to lack any actions of it's own. He is told what to do and morals be damned.

He is now making some point but has yet to write and make critisisim himself and expects others to take up his mantel in the name of his organization. However he now has made it clear that lies are quite acceptable and promotable as long as they are the right lies. He and the 911 truth organizations decide which lie is the right lie and will promote that lie. If found out, it is ok, it is artistic license and even more powerful in its message?

It is just so sad that I am not an artist so I can understand the difference. The only difference between a "non-fiction" and a "fiction" is that silly prefix "non-" and we can live without such a negative thing as "non-". "Fiction", even has a better sound. Sounds more like truth than "non-fiction" and more fun to watch like all good scifi.

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 11 guests online.

Sponsor

User login

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Web Pages referring to this page
Link to this page and get a link back!