Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
2 weeks 6 days ago - what?
2 weeks 6 days ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
3 weeks 9 hours ago - depends on settings
3 weeks 23 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
3 weeks 1 day ago - Never saw the comment
3 weeks 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
3 weeks 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
3 weeks 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
3 weeks 2 days ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
3 weeks 2 days ago
Bubble bursting time
Read the response at http://911researchers.com/node/67 for info. There is no reason to think it was a demolition job as of yet. Before spouting gibberish, look at the facts. When they are refuting your claims, stop spouting gibberish.
Poor Aqwa man
Yes, yes, I see, all very interesting. Your arguments are so deep, so well reasoned. You read the poll and have no idea what it asks. You are a shining example of an American public education system.
Besides the fact that you did not comprehend the question in the poll, perhaps you might find some way to tell me just why "There is no reason to think it was a demolition job". How many years should we give before we really want answers to such obvious effrontery?
The thing is....
Why assume it is a government conspiracy? In watching the video that is supposed to bring an epiphany, I was ony brought sadness for those who actually trusted the pathetic voice coming out of the computer.
As for the "How many years should we give before we really want answers to such obvious effrontery," the problem is that it is NOT obvious in any sense.
If you wish to take it on faith, that is your choice, and I cannot stop you. However, if you wish to be a true skeptic and look with an eye of reason, apply Occam's razor. See that there is no reason why it should be more than a terrorist attack. If you had cared to read and understand the comments on the link I posted, you would see my point as more than effrontery, but an obvious fact.
PS: Please do not be condecending with me. I find it irritating, and it has nothing to do with your argument. If I can treat others as sensible adults, you can too.
Shame on You
What a shame you think you can tell people what they see. Sorry there are questions and the government have offered no reasonable answer and neither have you.
The real insult is that you think 15 Arabs can take my country over for 2 hours without a lot of help. More than any freak in a cave can offer. If that were the case the whole government needs to be fired.
This poll is if WT7 appears to be a demolition and anyone looking at it would agree. It is a trick poll to pull trolls like you, cant you see "appear"? Only an idiot would fall for it and you did.
Reading your posts here in the last 24 hours it is clear you did not even know three towers where destroyed that day.
The Destruction
It is true, telling people that is almost as arrogent as thinking that we are invincible.
As for "appear," look at www.paregoricspills.com/wtc/wtc44.jpg Does that honestly look like a demolition to you? Do you see steel beams vaporizing to dust there? If the answer is yes, I apologize for your blind faith.
Perhaps the whole government does need to be fired, and perhaps it was a conspiracy. But there is no reason to think that. The debris and asymmetry of that picture would seem to suggest otherwise.
Thank you for your time,
Random Guy #36
Aqwas Nitwit Again
Aqwas, your idiocy is getting really disgusting. Your picture has nothing to do with WTC7, the tower you did not know about.
Please take time to stay on a thread topic. That is obviously south tower not WTC7. It looks like 15 to 70 ton segments of the south tower blown out over 300 to 600 feet from the side of the south tower.
Nothing to do with WTC7 so get it out of here and try a bit harder to get yourself straight and drop the jealousy.
Scarey stuff
Loki, i agree. The poll is for WTC7.
Maybe 7 is a spoonerism of 1 + 2
Orwell is flabbergasted ;)