**We know that many of these people are satanists.
**We know that these peoples' plans to create the events in the Book of Revelation were clearly spelled out in this 1995 card game, and that it predicted the WTC and Pentagon attacks.
**We know that every July these people go to Bohemian Grove, a redwood forest in California, for an occult ritual called the Cremation of Care. We know Richard Nixon has called Bohemian Grove the "most faggy goddamned thing you could ever imagine".
**We know that (man made) Global Warming is a scam and that the noticeable climate changes are due to weather modification. We know the purpose of labeling it as Global Warming is to make the public think there's no way out of it.
**We know that these people plant propaganda in the media, such as Ground Zero molten metal, to steer the 9/11 "truth movement" down the wrong path. We know they don't care if the propaganda "inside job" evidence is discussed, because they plan a fascist police state anyway.
**We know that former Brigham Young University physics professor Steven E Jones was planted to distract people from former Clemson University mechanical engineering professor Dr Judy Wood and the evidence of DEWs, and TV-Fakery / no-planes.
**We know that Steven Jones is a Mormon who wrote a paper entitled "Behold My Hands: Evidence for Christ’s Visit in Ancient America", where he uses Mayan depictions as evidence.
**We know that petroleum scientist Richard Duncan "predicted"Peak Oil / Permanent Worldwide Blackouts to strike in 2012. We know Duncan updated his "prediction" to 2008.
**We know that the present Peak Oil crisis is a hoax and that the earth has plenty of oil. We know the purpose of labeling it as Peak Oil is to make the public think there's no way out of it.
**We know that in 1993, Dr Mallove appeared in this TV news interview where he discusses the end of the oil age and the beginning of Free Energy.
**We know that in 2004 Dr Mallove wrote an open letter to world scientists asking for research funds for free energy, specifically Cold Fusion and Zero Point Energy.
**We know that these people plan to limit the amount of oil/gas (electricity & water), and label it as Peak Oil.
**We know that these people plan to create hurricanes, droughts, and tsunamis, and label it as Global Warming.
**We know that these people plan to use the Peak Oil and Global Warming scams to reduce human population, especially in areas that fight against the New World Order.
(I don't have links for the last three, but they "fit".)
============================
***The above information should help put things in context for easier understanding of what's happening***
(Note: some of the links given are for reference only. I did not read all of them.)
DISCLAIMER: I am not accusing any of the mentioned people of being satanists.
=======================================
Geologist Lauren Moray discusses several of the topics mentioned above in this interview by Dr James Fetzer:
Free Energy Exists - But The Oil Companies Don't Want Us To Know
"A Segment from a Documentary shot in the early 90's about Global Conspiracies. This footage speaks for itself."
============================
HARRP Can Modify the Weather
The Discovery Channel - Owning the Weather:
"Documentary that looks at the history of weather modification and its use by the military. Among the topics covered are: cloud seeding, HAARP and declassified experiments"
"Remove these people from power" How? Who? With what? Right now the BTS site is down. There is no limit to the amount of power available. Whats going to happen when people as a whole start to look at the evidence in front of them. Its going to bring chaos. I personally think thats what they want. How many "clues" were left. I think the video "mistakes" made that day were intentionally done. If you want to control a population and want to bring about the police state, these actions might just do it. Now the question of who is remarkable. Its not just a few guys elected. Its big. Real big. Wide spread big.
The weopans at disposal are obviously quite nasty. And supposedly other countries have just as much if not more nastiness then we have. Its said in the bible that God brought about the flood to wipe out humanity. The bible mentions God as being Plural, a group. http://www.halexandria.org/dward180.htm
Great site above.
Are the forces that brought the flood still in power. Notice that its says the Sons of God took the daughters of men for wives. Mostly overlooked or dismissed.
Imagine the writer of Revelation if he manipulated people to think Jesus would save the Earth, humanity from destruction. How insideous would that be. Whats scarry is why would the powers that be knowing the Bible prophecy, continue if they knew the end result. Even in the book of Revelation it says wormwood is coming which will create serious problems. http://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/neo/index.html
I think this is an interesting article on laser use. http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project251.html http://www.rense.com/politics4/hit.htm
"The Pentagon and administration covered up the incident as part of a "coordinated effort . . . by select individuals to disprove that this incident had ever actually occurred," he said. "Evidence was altered, ignored, omitted and refuted."
Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Sat, 2007-06-16 22:14.
There are billions of "good" people and only a few million (or hundred thousand?) of these evil people. Yes, they have the weapons. But we have the numbers. Chaos is better than a satanic police state. I'm merely looking at the choices we have at our disposal.
I think *orderly/organized* chaos is the best bet.
the elite have been in charge for a long long time.
The most important aspect to consider is;
when one looks outside of oneself for a solution one will never find an answer
Seriously, thats the trick... just like TV Fakery.. it is directed at you, the human being, the individual. Looking to the government is the deception of the modern world.
The modern tool of the trade is to direct attention to Government and group think -- the body politic. Its a myriad of contrivance to 'destroy the individual'/
Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Sat, 2007-06-16 22:12.
People are brainwashed into blindly trusting whatever the government and media say. No matter how ridiculous the story.... whether it be boxcutter-wielding Muslims, or little green men from mars. *If* the Global Elite say it, people *will* believe it.
Submitted by andrew lowe watson on Sat, 2007-06-16 22:52.
I am highly skeptical of the satanism/voodoo/Mayan/ numerology stuff. I think 911 was chosen because it is the US emerency number and has that subliminal connotation of emergency. I suspect the 'Demon Head' is either a smoke effect or a cartoon designed to scare susceptible people. There's no religious significance behind any of it - just our old friends Power and Money. Bohemian Grove - dunno, looks pretty juvenile to me. Surely real devil worshippers would be a bit more secret - and less Am Dram? Even the Mano Cornuta looks fake to me. Too obvious by far.
As far as lizard people go - I don't. But then by all accounts I probably am one myself and don't know it. Excuse me while I shed a skin or two.
The rest is just smoke and mirrors added for diversion and entertainment.
Efforts by clowns like Alex Jones or Texe Marrs to boost the "Illuminatist" or "Satanist" themes really are an attempt to mystify things in typical Hollywood style.
The globaliist perps behind 9/11 and the "War on Terror" are gangsters pure and simple.
But dressing them up in black robes (a la Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut") surrounded by smoke, incense and numerological mumbo-jumbo is a great way to muddy the waters, scatter red herrings and keep activists fixated on tabloid-style trivialization or mystification, romanticizing the essential GANGSTER character of the perps.
Its like movies and novels about the Mafia, where secret handshakes and secrecy oaths are always emphasized, to add color to the plotline.
When the real substance of what is at stake is primarily MONEY and POWER.
This sort of mystification of criminality also plays to the backwardness, ignorance of basic science and history, and general tendency of the great unwashed to be sidetracked and diverted with religious or occultic themes.
With respect to 9/11, it is like the "George Noory"-ization of the evidence.
Shroud it in tabloid-style "mystery".
But I also see a similar aspect to the undue emphasis on the precise character of ExoW used at Ground Zero.
That's more of the UFO-ization of 9/11; mystification using sci-fi themes.
The net effect of mystifying the crimes of 9/11 and the perps behind them is to OBSCURE THE ESSENTIALLY CORPORATE (BUSINESS) CHARACTER AND MOTIVE BEHIND THE CRIME.
An attempt to make people forget that "globalization" is, at its core, a CORPORATE (business) driven process.
The flashy uniforms, jackboots and regalia of the Nazis was nothing but clever mass marketing/advertising and public relations.
"Image management".
Behind the glitz and glitter, the essential character of true "evil" is just a nerdy little bureaucrat in his business suit and glasses, shuffling papers and "following orders".
No need for "Satanists" or "illuminati" with their "demonic" rituals.
========================================
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil is a book written by political theorist Hannah Arendt, originally published in 1963. Arendt, a Jew who fled Germany during Hitler's rise to power, reported on Adolf Eichmann's trial for The New Yorker.
Arendt states that aside from a desire for improving his career, Eichmann showed no trace of anti-Semitism or psychological damage. Her subtitle famously referred to the "banality of evil," and that phrase is used quite abruptly as the final words of the final chapter. In part, at least, the phrase refers to Eichmann's deportment at the trial, displaying neither guilt nor hatred, claiming he bore no responsibility because he was simply "doing his job" ("He did his duty...; he not only obeyed orders, he also obeyed the law." p. 135).
Arendt takes Eichmann's court testimony and the historical evidence available, and makes several observations about Eichmann:
* Eichmann stated himself in court that he had always tried to abide by Kant's categorical imperative (as discussed directly on pp. 135-137). She argues that Eichmann had essentially taken the wrong lesson from Kant: Eichmann had not recognized the "Golden Rule" and principle of reciprocity implicit in the categorical imperative, but had only understood the concept of one man's actions coinciding with general law. Eichmann attempted to follow the spirit of the laws he carried out, as if the legislator himself would approve. In Kant's formulation of the categorical imperative, the legislator is the moral self, and all men are legislators; in Eichmann's formulation, the legislator was Adolf Hitler. Eichmann claimed this changed when he was charged with carrying out the Final Solution, at which point Arendt claims "he had ceased to live according to Kantian principles, that he had known it, and that he had consoled himself with the thoughts that he no longer 'was master of his own deeds,' that he was unable 'to change anything' (p. 136).
* Eichmann's inability to think for himself was exemplified by his consistent use of "stock phrases and self-invented clichés." This "officialese" (Amtssprache) demonstrated his unrealistic worldview and crippling lack of communication skills.
* Eichmann, in his peripheral role at the Wannsee Conference (so Arendt argued), witnessed the rank-and-file of the German civil service heartily endorse Reinhard Heydrich's program for the Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe. Upon seeing members of "respectable society" endorsing Hitler's most reprehensible crime, and enthusiastically participating in the planning of the solution, Eichmann felt that his moral responsibility was relaxed, as if he were "Pontius Pilate".
* During his imprisonment before his trial, the Israeli government sent no less than six psychologists to examine Eichmann. Not only did these doctors find no trace of mental illness, but they also found no evidence of abnormal personality whatsoever. One doctor remarked that his overall attitude towards other people, especially his family and friends, was "highly desirable," while another remarked that the only unusual trait Eichmann displayed was being more "normal" in his habits and speech than the average person.
Arendt suggested that this most strikingly discredits the idea that the Nazi criminals were manifestly psychopathic and different from common people. From this document, many concluded that situations such as the Holocaust can make even the most ordinary of people commit horrendous crimes with the proper incentives, but Arendt adamantly disagreed with this interpretation, as Eichmann was voluntarily following the Führerprinzip. Arendt insisted that moral choice remains even under totalitarianism, and that this choice has political consequences even when the chooser is politically powerless:
Here is the major problem with the points you make.
"Remove these people from power" How? Who? With what? Right now the BTS site is down. There is no limit to the amount of power available. Whats going to happen when people as a whole start to look at the evidence in front of them. Its going to bring chaos. I personally think thats what they want. How many "clues" were left. I think the video "mistakes" made that day were intentionally done. If you want to control a population and want to bring about the police state, these actions might just do it. Now the question of who is remarkable. Its not just a few guys elected. Its big. Real big. Wide spread big.
The weopans at disposal are obviously quite nasty. And supposedly other countries have just as much if not more nastiness then we have. Its said in the bible that God brought about the flood to wipe out humanity. The bible mentions God as being Plural, a group.
http://www.halexandria.org/dward180.htm
Great site above.
Are the forces that brought the flood still in power. Notice that its says the Sons of God took the daughters of men for wives. Mostly overlooked or dismissed.
Imagine the writer of Revelation if he manipulated people to think Jesus would save the Earth, humanity from destruction. How insideous would that be. Whats scarry is why would the powers that be knowing the Bible prophecy, continue if they knew the end result. Even in the book of Revelation it says wormwood is coming which will create serious problems.
http://www.ips.gov.au/IPSHosted/neo/index.html
I think this is an interesting article on laser use.
http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Shadowlands/6583/project251.html
http://www.rense.com/politics4/hit.htm
"The Pentagon and administration covered up the incident as part of a "coordinated effort . . . by select individuals to disprove that this incident had ever actually occurred," he said. "Evidence was altered, ignored, omitted and refuted."
my point is...
There are billions of "good" people and only a few million (or hundred thousand?) of these evil people. Yes, they have the weapons. But we have the numbers. Chaos is better than a satanic police state. I'm merely looking at the choices we have at our disposal.
I think *orderly/organized* chaos is the best bet.
getting into it
make no mistake tho ....
the elite have been in charge for a long long time.
The most important aspect to consider is;
when one looks outside of oneself for a solution one will never find an answer
Seriously, thats the trick... just like TV Fakery.. it is directed at you, the human being, the individual. Looking to the government is the deception of the modern world.
The modern tool of the trade is to direct attention to Government and group think -- the body politic. Its a myriad of contrivance to 'destroy the individual'/
brainwashing
People are brainwashed into blindly trusting whatever the government and media say. No matter how ridiculous the story.... whether it be boxcutter-wielding Muslims, or little green men from mars. *If* the Global Elite say it, people *will* believe it.
Not convinced
I am highly skeptical of the satanism/voodoo/Mayan/ numerology stuff. I think 911 was chosen because it is the US emerency number and has that subliminal connotation of emergency. I suspect the 'Demon Head' is either a smoke effect or a cartoon designed to scare susceptible people. There's no religious significance behind any of it - just our old friends Power and Money. Bohemian Grove - dunno, looks pretty juvenile to me. Surely real devil worshippers would be a bit more secret - and less Am Dram? Even the Mano Cornuta looks fake to me. Too obvious by far.
As far as lizard people go - I don't. But then by all accounts I probably am one myself and don't know it. Excuse me while I shed a skin or two.
...i join ALW on that
...i join ALW on that rational view !!
Furthermore "Numerology" is a distraction from uncrackable military codes and their related psyOPs.
a distraction?
Please explain
Sometimes it takes a while to digest all this.
I added more information since your comment..... let me know what you think
911 was used because it is the US emergency number
The rest is just smoke and mirrors added for diversion and entertainment.
Efforts by clowns like Alex Jones or Texe Marrs to boost the "Illuminatist" or "Satanist" themes really are an attempt to mystify things in typical Hollywood style.
The globaliist perps behind 9/11 and the "War on Terror" are gangsters pure and simple.
But dressing them up in black robes (a la Kubrick's "Eyes Wide Shut") surrounded by smoke, incense and numerological mumbo-jumbo is a great way to muddy the waters, scatter red herrings and keep activists fixated on tabloid-style trivialization or mystification, romanticizing the essential GANGSTER character of the perps.
Its like movies and novels about the Mafia, where secret handshakes and secrecy oaths are always emphasized, to add color to the plotline.
When the real substance of what is at stake is primarily MONEY and POWER.
This sort of mystification of criminality also plays to the backwardness, ignorance of basic science and history, and general tendency of the great unwashed to be sidetracked and diverted with religious or occultic themes.
With respect to 9/11, it is like the "George Noory"-ization of the evidence.
Shroud it in tabloid-style "mystery".
But I also see a similar aspect to the undue emphasis on the precise character of ExoW used at Ground Zero.
That's more of the UFO-ization of 9/11; mystification using sci-fi themes.
The net effect of mystifying the crimes of 9/11 and the perps behind them is to OBSCURE THE ESSENTIALLY CORPORATE (BUSINESS) CHARACTER AND MOTIVE BEHIND THE CRIME.
An attempt to make people forget that "globalization" is, at its core, a CORPORATE (business) driven process.
Mystifying and "colorizing" the essential banality of evil
The flashy uniforms, jackboots and regalia of the Nazis was nothing but clever mass marketing/advertising and public relations.
"Image management".
Behind the glitz and glitter, the essential character of true "evil" is just a nerdy little bureaucrat in his business suit and glasses, shuffling papers and "following orders".
No need for "Satanists" or "illuminati" with their "demonic" rituals.
========================================
Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report on the Banality of Evil is a book written by political theorist Hannah Arendt, originally published in 1963. Arendt, a Jew who fled Germany during Hitler's rise to power, reported on Adolf Eichmann's trial for The New Yorker.
Arendt states that aside from a desire for improving his career, Eichmann showed no trace of anti-Semitism or psychological damage. Her subtitle famously referred to the "banality of evil," and that phrase is used quite abruptly as the final words of the final chapter. In part, at least, the phrase refers to Eichmann's deportment at the trial, displaying neither guilt nor hatred, claiming he bore no responsibility because he was simply "doing his job" ("He did his duty...; he not only obeyed orders, he also obeyed the law." p. 135).
Arendt takes Eichmann's court testimony and the historical evidence available, and makes several observations about Eichmann:
* Eichmann stated himself in court that he had always tried to abide by Kant's categorical imperative (as discussed directly on pp. 135-137). She argues that Eichmann had essentially taken the wrong lesson from Kant: Eichmann had not recognized the "Golden Rule" and principle of reciprocity implicit in the categorical imperative, but had only understood the concept of one man's actions coinciding with general law. Eichmann attempted to follow the spirit of the laws he carried out, as if the legislator himself would approve. In Kant's formulation of the categorical imperative, the legislator is the moral self, and all men are legislators; in Eichmann's formulation, the legislator was Adolf Hitler. Eichmann claimed this changed when he was charged with carrying out the Final Solution, at which point Arendt claims "he had ceased to live according to Kantian principles, that he had known it, and that he had consoled himself with the thoughts that he no longer 'was master of his own deeds,' that he was unable 'to change anything' (p. 136).
* Eichmann's inability to think for himself was exemplified by his consistent use of "stock phrases and self-invented clichés." This "officialese" (Amtssprache) demonstrated his unrealistic worldview and crippling lack of communication skills.
* Eichmann, in his peripheral role at the Wannsee Conference (so Arendt argued), witnessed the rank-and-file of the German civil service heartily endorse Reinhard Heydrich's program for the Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Europe. Upon seeing members of "respectable society" endorsing Hitler's most reprehensible crime, and enthusiastically participating in the planning of the solution, Eichmann felt that his moral responsibility was relaxed, as if he were "Pontius Pilate".
* During his imprisonment before his trial, the Israeli government sent no less than six psychologists to examine Eichmann. Not only did these doctors find no trace of mental illness, but they also found no evidence of abnormal personality whatsoever. One doctor remarked that his overall attitude towards other people, especially his family and friends, was "highly desirable," while another remarked that the only unusual trait Eichmann displayed was being more "normal" in his habits and speech than the average person.
Arendt suggested that this most strikingly discredits the idea that the Nazi criminals were manifestly psychopathic and different from common people. From this document, many concluded that situations such as the Holocaust can make even the most ordinary of people commit horrendous crimes with the proper incentives, but Arendt adamantly disagreed with this interpretation, as Eichmann was voluntarily following the Führerprinzip. Arendt insisted that moral choice remains even under totalitarianism, and that this choice has political consequences even when the chooser is politically powerless:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eichmann_in_Jerusalem