Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
5 days 23 hours ago - what?
6 days 4 hours ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
1 week 4 hours ago - depends on settings
1 week 17 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
1 week 18 hours ago - Never saw the comment
1 week 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
1 week 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
1 week 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
1 week 1 day ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
1 week 1 day ago
Fetzer Trying to Gain Credibility?
I find it funny that the doctor of fiction is there actually putting prnewswires out to try and bolster his credibility after his continued debacle with 9/11 Mysteries.
The man is a fiction.
Doesn't the fact of an overfly work into the stand down line? Don't shoot a friendly?
Perhaps he considers other matters more important?
Makes sense to me.
Regarding the overfly, yes, I was thinking about that last night.
Stand Down Order possible without plane crash
Just because the plane crashes are fake, doesn't mean someone wouldn't issue orders telling the military not to shoot down suspected hijacked planes. The vast majority of people in the military and the FAA are not read into the 9/11 operation, so a stand down order makes sense to keep anyone from getting too gung-ho or trigger-happy. imho
I'd be surprised if Norm Mineta is a perp. It seems to me he tried to answer questions honestly. To the extent that the bad guys are a faction rather than the entire USG, it makes sense that they would do things to "fake out" the non-treasonous members of the government and armed forces.
Fred
The FAA told Mineta they
The FAA told Mineta they were tracking a plane coming from the northwest on a down river approach. There is a big discrepency between what the FAA was tracking and the official version from the West.
http://www.msnbc.com/modules/91102/interviews/mineta.asp?0cb=-31a105678&...
Its been argued that Mineta was not there at 9:25 and mixed up the time but Shanksville is nowhere near Great Falls and National Airport.
I may have found a few new tells in the the Sept clues videos??
Check out the LIVE banner in the upper portion of
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jO9U1cIZM84
At 28 seconds in on the above link and at the 6:28 mark on sept clues. The LIVE banner seems to glitch.
If it did not mean anything then why the coverup at the 1:29 mark in sept clues part 5 with CNN showing a completely different Live Banner.
Also with the audio incident, check out the E in live from the above link at the 5:21 mark and also 5:21 mark in the SC P5 video. There is a simultaneous glitch with the disconnect of the audio and the glitch in the E in Live at the upper left.
Either way Its doubtfull any of this matters. Its clear to me people really dont like Muslums and it makes for an easy target. Even if the truth outs, people will say you did what. Hell if you wanted to attack Iraq and Afghanistan all you had to do was say so. We fell for the duct tape scare. We dont like muslums and we want gas as cheap as we can get it. You guys do what you have to do.
Crazy world we live in.
People still drivel too much
People still drivel too much Ruppert and/or LaRouche
instead of reading Jared Israel.
Norman Mineta is complete innocent from anything and Cheney had zero to do with any "war game" or "terror drill".
Stand-down for "no-planes" makes also still sense in year 6 after 9/11.
The Mineta-rap is like the 10 amendments from the Orwellian 9/11 Truthling Rap ;
Nico, was it your research
that uncovered Mineta as being a former top level exec at Boeing? (or one of those DEW affiliated companies..?)
...nope but he worked with
...nope but he worked with Lockheed, which works close with Boeing ;
He's now with Hill & Knowlton, which had been mainly responsible for the lies building up to Gulf War I
http://www.opensecrets.org/bush/cabinet/cabinet.mineta.asp
http://www.boeing.com/commercial/noise/san_jose.html
Norman Y. Mineta San Jose International Airport
Lockheed, that's the one.
The Mineta standdown thing had to be purposeful propaganda, since it was on C-SPAN.
Either the whole stand down thing was made up (in which case Mineta is "in on it"), or he witnessed a real stand down order for a real plane that veered off the Pentagon, possibly with optical camouflage. Or.... a stand down order for a military jet
Purposeful or not, it does
Purposeful or not, it does not help Cheny in any way. Door #1 The Stand down: This means they are tracking the craft the whole way in no matter what hit the pentagon from a minimum of 50 miles out. Who is tracking the radar and giving cheny the updates is a big question but either way he had plenty of time to notify the pentagon that they might get hit. His nonaction directly resulted in the death of 125 employees at the pentagon based on minetas interview and testamony.
In this case I dont see how an arrest isnt made.
Door #2 An order to strike the pentagon: I dont think details are needed on this one.
One thing I find ironic, Cheny loves spying on citizens yet when asked for his documents somehow he can just say no.
Must be nice to have the power to tell Congress to go to hell.
Mineta says nothing
The timing is unclear, and there's no way to know what Cheney and the officer were talking about. Its a huge distraction that reinforces the planes lie. The idea of Cheney in he bunker as a key part of the operation is a cartoon version of 9/11 "truth."
I've been arguing about this at 9/11 Blogger, where Jim Hoffmann's disinfo about DOD regs, caught by Holmgren, still lives as part of the cartoon version of 9/11. I had to use cached versions of Holmgren's article.
http://911blogger.com/node/9629#comment-153055