Our Mission
Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.
Navigation
Book navigation
Popular content
Recent comments
- Cant figure it out
5 days 22 hours ago - what?
6 days 3 hours ago - nico vs. gengho debate about
1 week 3 hours ago - depends on settings
1 week 16 hours ago - gengho continues to prove his
1 week 17 hours ago - Never saw the comment
1 week 1 day ago - dude, the debate is over
1 week 1 day ago - replaced buildings?
1 week 1 day ago - This below is my conclusive
1 week 1 day ago - What "hmm"? Don't give me a
1 week 1 day ago
[6:46:04 PM] ewing2001 says:
[6:46:04 PM] ewing2001 says: [6:45:15 PM] ewing2001 says: cant delete coffin..i think rick disabled my co-admin...i think i will leave then...
[6:45:24 PM] ewing2001 says: http://www.911researchers.com/node/713
[6:45:58 PM] ewing2001 says: he un-enabled him...coffin also too stupid to see *that difference...if i would have deleted his account, he couldnt can come back..
[6:48:19 PM] ewing2001 says:
[6:48:19 PM] ewing2001 says: im out rick GOODBYE!
...
[7:05:09 PM] ewing2001 says: will copy to rick goodbye on hold..
http://www.911researchers.com/node/709
--taking off!
Get off your Ego Trips
Is this a genuine 911 research site or a place for petty squabbles.
FFS do you not all agree on no planes, video fakery and DEW.
Why are you stabbing each other on the back, you are behaving like spoilt brats.
Carry on with the excellent research you are doing and bury the hatchet
Norfolk and MBV
You sound like a pair of trolls.
We are outing traitors, exposing their lies and treacherous actions.
If direct sabotage in a variety of ways towards this site doesn't seem like hostile action to you guys then maybe you support that kind of action?
You want me to "rest up" and leave Haupt and Grable to spread false allegations that would destroy my reputation and credibility if unanswered????!
You see Rick pleading with Haupt to stop placing the site in danger by posting grossly obscene content and you describe what is taking place as a "personality battle"?
You are clouding the truth.
You are misrepresenting what has taken place.
A deep-planted agent has been exposed here, and he has gone on a rampage of sabotage when he found that he was unable to stop his outing.
All of this was in order to defend the Wood-Reynolds-Fetzer gang.
He has forfeited his cover in his desperate attempt to smear me and stop me from exposing the situation.
As soon as I mentioned that I was going to move on and look at the reasons for what he and Webfairy did he tried to silence me by disabling my account.
He went back again to try and DELETE my account but he was no longer able.
If he had deleted my work exposing him and Webfairy then you f*kin trolls would continue as if none of it had happened.
Are you on side with him and his attack on our research community?
Do you think it's okay for these agents to falsely attribute quotes to people in a smear campaign?
Are you happy with Nico posting filth here to drive people away from the site?
Are you happy with Fetzer's variable physics?
Or Fetzers support of 911mysteries?
Or Loose Change?
These are issues that affect our research community.
They are more important at this moment than other issues that do not threaten to destroy what we have achieved so far.
Anyone who supports what Haupt has done does not have the interests of this research community, or the truth about 911 in mind.
If they support Haupt then they support the sabotage of evidence, the spreading of lies, and the planting of obscene material amongst our material.
At least now things are so extreme that only the most stupid of people can fail to grasp what has happened.
Sabotage = enemy.
Is that difficult???
Coffinman
[9:32:00 AM] ewing2001 says:
[9:32:00 AM] ewing2001 says: rick sides with coffin..i read it again...now he writes i rin my own sexOP...hes full of it...im done with rick...
[9:33:12 AM] ewing2001 says: rin= run
[9:34:42 AM] ewing2001 says: http://www.911researchers.com/node/713#comment-5502[9:39:21 AM] ewing2001 says: [9:32:00 AM] ewing2001 says: rick sides with coffin..i read it again...now he writes i rin my own sexOP...hes full of it...im done with rick...
[9:33:12 AM] ewing2001 says: rin= run
[9:39:33 AM] ewing2001 says: [5:40:35 AM] ewing2001 says: 9/11 Video Mashup Top 40 Charts + Updates moves to new Webfairy Server http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3717 http://thewebfairy.com/bloglines/ 07/16 New 9/11 Video Mashups TOP 40 (New Entries from BSreg, Genghis etc...) [now up] .... l9r...
[9:39:53 AM] ewing2001 says: [9:37:28 AM] ewing2001 says: so its alllowed to have sexual slander and it is not allowed to reveal sexual slander?...i posted twice at ricks site xxstuff..that was at 911bloggertv.com and then some feces..the rest was text..i had neither embed xxxploitation stuff at 911res nor will i do it at 911closeup...i outsource these videos...rick is a stinking doubletalker...
[9:39:01 AM] ewing2001 says: hes a whiner and possibly chauvinist too..he doesnt like strong and intelligent women..i promised him to never post xxxvideos and clearly i didnt want to risk his provider...the feces posting was basically also a farewell to rick ...
[9:43:29 AM] ewing2001 says: u full of it RICK...sexual slur and slander was started first by Coffin..i [sic: even] revealed the gender Diversion psyOP first [on 911bloglines.com]...i even reacted first with my transgression xxploitation Ops on it...u never read my bloglines neither u have a FUKIN clue what the Gender diversion psyOP actually is...if u EVER claim again, Rosalee started it i will slander YOU... Griffin['s handlers] planted it and it was triggered by Fetzer, noone else plus the passive behavior by Wood which was instrumentalized as a multiple honeypot. U DONT KNOW shit about psychology, multiple personality misorder and dont even know how many other moles are sitting in this stinking movement who *also forced it i am aware of it..FUK U and goodbye !!
[9:43:47 AM] ewing2001 says: 911researchers.com is now officially run by coffinman!!!
[9:50:58 AM] ewing2001 says: i even revealed that they continue testing it in france... U THINK IT IS A COINCIDENCE IF A HOMOPHOBIC Minister in France says 9/11 inside job?.. u have no FUKIN CLUE waz going on.. Coffinman the 1998 HTMLers destroyed your site..you let him go...YOU let your website ruin by a schoolbuy who gets fuked by transsexual busdrivers from tavistock and gets turned around by SLANDERING Rosalee and SLURRING a multiple of silent Wood...Siegel claims that a harmless psychological remark from Rosalee was SEXIST while a slurrist remark from a "man" gets a free pass...aha...fuk u and you sloppy holmgren who has no stinking clue anymore waz going on in this movement.
YOU allow Chauvinists like Fetzer and Coffin to take over and ALLOW *artistic responses like from me to get slandered...U moved to Spain possibly coz u are a whimp... why dont u say that u are a chauvinist?? mayeb u wife side with u coz she likes that..u are really worse than i thought..dont worry about my sexploitations any longer
..i am already bored from them as well..i will make them more underground..assholes like u and coffin have no clue what im doing...i will bury them slowly..while u guys go under with a simplicistc Gender diversion psyOP...u yelled at me when u site went down while i was busy fighting 3 hour sleep days... FUK U again asshole..i gave u 48 hours...8 months friendship is over
[PS: I will definetely NOT deface 911res again. People who have melted away their own IQ have no clue about the difference between xx-art and profane conservative chauvinism anyway. I make sure that all my stuff is asthetic.
Coffinman is one of the sickest and dumbest chauvinists i ever met in my life. He can lie all day long. He's part of the Gender Diversion psyOP and i consider him now as a Tavistock plant too, no matter if payrolled...
These things work like Ver Chapman was *coincidentally a busdriver witness from 7/7 false flag when she came into our life. Who knows who Coffin worked for when he was triggered into our mashup scene?
Im glad i dont have to write any longer blogs. Long live research and video where i dont need to waste time to "run some argument", You guys did me a favor. Noone of you both will ever be able to win a [scientific] argument anyway. No more stinking blogs for me for a while. ;]
-> http://thewebfairy.com/bloglines/
this is the last time i am posting this:
[see also
CointelPRO: Griffin revealed as "Feminism/Ecofeminism[Sexism] Diversion" Intel OP plant
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ewing2001?id=3598 ]
Only people like Alex Constantine and Geo have a grip what's really going on in this diversion movement. You guys even destroy video expressionalism. This is sad ; (
More slander and threats from Haupt?
Nico accuses Rick of sexism now:
[[9:39:01 AM] ewing2001 says: hes a whiner and possibly chauvinist too..he doesnt like strong and intelligent women..]
He repeats the lie:
[sexual slur and slander was started first by Coffin.]
We have proven that it was Grable who made the sexist statement.
He would have provided an earlier, sexist quote from me if one had existed.
[u never read my bloglines neither]
Not surprised, bad English, garbled and with bunches of unidentified links, and no clear statement a lot of the time.
A person would have to have nothing better to do.
Now if you EXPLAINED YOURSELF IN ENGLISH....
Another threat to slander Rick:
[if u EVER claim again, Rosalee started it i will slander YOU...]
An example of garbled words that have no clear meaning or explanation:
[instrumentalized as a multiple honeypot.]
-Are we all supposed to use telepathy then to understand what he means?
I use words to explain myself.
So do most people.
Is this what he's telling people:
[911researchers.com is now officially run by coffinman!!!]
More lies.
I don't even have moderator status.
Haupt was helping to run the place.
Until he tried some sabotage and got his moderator privileges removed.
More slander about me:
[a schoolbuy who gets fuked by transsexual busdrivers]
And he has the CHEEK to accuse me of:
[SLANDERING Rosalee]!!!!!!!
He says:
[Siegel claims that a harmless psychological remark from Rosalee was SEXIST while a slurrist remark from a "man" gets a free pass.]
Well we can look at that again can't we:
Webfairy said:
[When a man protects a woman it just about guarantees she will not speak out against him. The fear of losing that protection is too great.
I'm a case in point.
I disagree with Holmgren on a number of issues, but I kept quiet out of respect and subservience, cos he bodyguarded me.]
And she later added:
[A woman experiences a hormonal level rush of loyalty toward a man who will fight her battles for her.
This is part of the complex set of biological drives aimed at self preservation and the perservation of the species that comes programmed into the human species automatically, as part of the genetic code that proved it's mettle over the past hundred thousand years, or whenever it is humans first arose.
It is inevitable as Newton's Third Law of Motion. A sign of authenticity like a bellybutton.]
This is what I posed as the logic of what she had said:
[A woman can be lying or otherwise acting other than in the best interests at any time due to hormonal factors.]
The above is what ALL of these sexist allegations are about.
Notice the treatening remark at the end:
[assholes like u and coffin have no clue what im doing]
Coffinman
Nico does lots of good work
Every now and then I'll look at something and think, wow, that's really not helping. But you know, Nico's made many valuable contributions along the way and I hope he'll keep doing good work. There's all sorts of great information in his FCS articles.
As we all know, many very bright people are highly eccentric and we won't get too far if we just focus on people's flaws and ignore what they're trying to tell us.
As far as I can tell, Nico's track record is very solid. That doesn't mean he's going to be right 100% of the time, and it doesn't mean he can't be distracted or drawn into petty arguments. The frustration level from doing this kind of work is very high and it makes everyone grouchy.
Fred
Fred, are you misrepresenting this situation??
[As we all know, many very bright people are highly eccentric and we won't get too far if we just focus on people's flaws and ignore what they're trying to tell us.]
I have proven:
1. Webfairy made the sexist statement, which I opposed viciously.
2. Haupt knowingly attempts (still) to discredit me by falsely attributing Webfairy's outlook to me.
3. Haupt will not say he disagrees with Webfairy's sexist outlook.
I am about to look into the why's of his behaviour shortly.
He also tried to sabotage this forum, and remove posts that exposed to a certain group of traitors working amongst us.
Are you telling us we should ignore these things?!
The answer to this question is of greater importance than any video you may produce.
I will not tolerate enemy agents working unopposed amongst us.
That is what I am here for.
To bust up their party.
In their own words:
"To let the chips fall where they may".
Coffinman
Not trying to misrepresent it... let me answer your points
Fred
[As we all know, many very bright people are highly eccentric and we won't get too far if we just focus on people's flaws and ignore what they're trying to tell us.]
>I have proven:
1. Webfairy made the sexist statement, which I opposed viciously.
My take on it is that Webfairy made a general point and you sort of jumped on it and extended it as a straw-man. I agree that it was WF who started talking about hormones first.
>2. Haupt knowingly attempts (still) to discredit me by falsely attributing Webfairy's outlook to me.
Haupt is into some kind of "Gender Diversion PSYOP" that I don't fully understand. My take on it is that he's saying that this whole sexist non-sexist thing is some kind of deliberate time-wasting distraction. If that's his sentiment, I agree with it. I couldn't care less whether Judy Wood is a man or a woman or from Mars. I'm sure most of us feel the same way.
>3. Haupt will not say he disagrees with Webfairy's sexist outlook.
Haupt is friends with WF, and I think WF's a good person. I think Haupt is a great guy, and I like you too. WF thinks maybe you're up to no good and she wishes you'd redirect your attention from Prof Wood, whom she feels is being unfairly attacked, to any of the numerous other bad guys there are out there in the world. WF is sticking up for Wood because of WF's beliefs about Wood.
>I am about to look into the why's of his behaviour shortly.
I'm always happy to tell you what I think about things, and I may be right or wrong.
>He also tried to sabotage this forum, and remove posts that exposed to a certain group of traitors working amongst us.
Are you telling us we should ignore these things?!
No, I'm not sure what happened. It seemed like you "cried wolf" once with a thread that wasn't deleted, and it looks like you're still here so I'm not sure what's going on. I'm glad you're here, I don't think we should be deleting threads.
>The answer to this question is of greater importance than any video you may produce.
>I will not tolerate enemy agents working unopposed amongst us.
I personally do not see WF or Nico in any way as being agents. I have my doubts about Fetzer. I'm certain that Alba, Welz, Sophia S, and some others are real-life agents. I wish Prof Wood would comment on crash physics, but apparently she's busy doing her own research, which seems to be pretty interesting, so I'm happy to let her do her thing and see what she comes up with.
>That is what I am here for.
To bust up their party.
In their own words:
"To let the chips fall where they may".
I understand what you're saying and where you're coming from, but I really don't see WF and Nico as any sort of agents at all. I think they're stressed out, I think they have lots of great ideas, I think sometimes they're wrong about things, but most of the time they're on the right track. Being grouchy and eccentric and having a temper doesn't really fit the "agent" profile too well in my opinion.
>Coffinman
I hope that lets you know where I'm coming from.
Fred
Fred
You need to let these people speak for themselves.
Don't be bodyguarding now.
And you accused me of:
[Webfairy made a general point and you sort of jumped on it and extended it as a straw-man.]
No, no,no.
What I extended Webfairy's logic to is exactly what it meant.
Let us look at that.
Webfairy said:
[When a man protects a woman it just about guarantees she will not speak out against him. The fear of losing that protection is too great.
I'm a case in point.
I disagree with Holmgren on a number of issues, but I kept quiet out of respect and subservience, cos he bodyguarded me.]
And she later added:
[A woman experiences a hormonal level rush of loyalty toward a man who will fight her battles for her.
This is part of the complex set of biological drives aimed at self preservation and the perservation of the species that comes programmed into the human species automatically, as part of the genetic code that proved it's mettle over the past hundred thousand years, or whenever it is humans first arose.
It is inevitable as Newton's Third Law of Motion. A sign of authenticity like a bellybutton.]
This is what I posed as the logic of what she had said:
[A woman can be lying or otherwise acting other than in the best interests at any time due to hormonal factors.]
People can decide what to think for themselves.
And you shouldn't be fighting for people who won't answer for themselves.
I don't do fighting through third parties.
It's a diversion anyway.
The fight was really with Reynolds, as we shall see.
Coffinman