Our Mission

Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 Research resource logo

Navigation

Book navigation

Popular content

Recent comments

9/11 Researchers

Webfairy, Nico and the smokescreen and smear campaign.

Coffinman's picture
Submitted by Coffinman on Mon, 2007-07-16 05:33

I have proven that Nico told a lie in order to discredit me and then refused to acknowledge the lie when it was proven.
He repeated to attribute to me a statement that was made by Webfairy even after I had proved that she had said it, and when.
He tried to destroy my reputation.
Once I had done this he deleted my account, and then tried to delete all of my work here.
Fortunately Rick had removed his moderator status by that time.
Now we need to move forward, out of the rut (troll fruit-loop) created by Nico.

Why on Earth would Nico feel the need to tell such a vicious lie and attempt to destroy my credibility?

I will examine the events which provoked Nico Haupt and Rosalee Grable to personally smear me with the lies I have documented in the Post titled

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
mvb's picture

Please

Without stepping on any foots!

Cant you guys handle this out on a privat chat?!
This Nico-vs-Coffinman celebrity Battle is geting
more and more very boring!

Thanks!

Coffinman's picture

mvb

[This Nico-vs-Coffinman celebrity Battle]
-Will you please stop talking utter crap.
Either you have not read the above article, or you are a troll trying to distract from it's content.
This issue is obviously not about personalities, as any fool can see.
This issue was one of bodyguarding.
I will post what I had said about bodyguarding prior to the diversion in another post.

Coffinman

zark's picture

Obviously Wood, Fetzer and

Obviously Wood, Fetzer and Reynolds are not independent of each other, they have an alliance that is more important to them than truth or correct science.

totally agree. They are politically motivated.

Webfairys post shows this to be the case:
objectivity swaps with politics and mixes around.
link
The biological imperative is, I will hazard a guess, straight out of the Phenomenology handbook [Husserls]. Social sciences way of saying "you have the biological basis, we will have the psychological and social"
I was lectured by Margaret Shildrick and found considerable flaws within the argument and philosophy but hey, some people dig it.

The mis-appropriated quotes by Nico are recognised and the issue of 'the group' within is valid.

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 3 guests online.

Sponsor

User login

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Web Pages referring to this page
Link to this page and get a link back!