From Fred yet.
Have you asked WF yet, Fred?
Why would the blob be real if the video is a composite?
Why would the perps include the real image in a fake video???

Coffinman

Why go on about stealth technology when we are discussing whether the image in this video is fake??!

This is NOT Chrisbornag's video, it's Naudet 1st hit.

Coffinman

that we will see Fred contradict anything that Grable has held as sacred.
Maybe if she makes a comment on it then he might feel able to agree with her.
Am I wrong Fred?
Can you see the impossibility of the shadow that John is talking about?
You were quite sharp analysing the CNN ghostplane, what about this?
If there is fakery here (and there is) then why would the blob necessarily be "genuine imagery of the 1st hit object"?
Isn't that a "little" faith-based, once we can see that fakery has been used here?

Coffinman

posted by chrisbormag ...
I'll try to source it better, unless one of you already has the sourcing for these gems ....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dju6OSPUSPM&mode=user&search=

No.. not a sheet of paper fluttering by....
Nor are any of the effects, artifacts of procesing or reformatting the images.

I really love the ending.
It's what makes the leap from evidence ... to "art".

What is shadowing the second building from right in the above image (on the southwest corner of Church and Walker, to the left of the large brown building on the right)?

This shadow could NOT exist at 8:46am on September 11, nor could it ever exist at the same time as the shadow seen on the (brown) ATT building.

Why did you post the blog? Was it to expose the fakery?

If so, why do you appear to avoid this proof of fakery?

Impossible shadows, Fred--it

Got any observations of your own, Fred, regarding the shadows?
Is John's reasoning impossible?
What could cause that shadow, other than the ATT building (to the right)?
But then the shadows ON the ATT building are being cast in a different direction.
More double shadows?
Or cut-and-paste artwork?
And the most important question we need to look at, you still haven't offered an opinion, i.e. if the shot has been manufactured, then why would anyone at all assume that the actual 1st hit object was included in the production?
This puzzles me.
You already mentioned layers, so you seem to think that the footage is fake.
What do you yourself think about the artefact formerly known as "blobs 11"?

Coffinman

Fred, were you not able to follow the instructions in my first comment?

Your

Could they be fake shadows, perchance?
I trust your jugdement, Fred:
What do you think?

Coffinman