Our Mission

Open research to uncover the truths surrounding events of September 11, 2001.

9/11 Research resource logo

Navigation

Popular content

Recent comments


this was sitemeter

9/11 Researchers

Steven Jones Brainwashes The 9/11 Truth Movement With "Space Beams" Term

CB_Brooklyn's picture
Submitted by CB_Brooklyn on Mon, 2007-01-15 00:12.

The 9/11 term "space beam" was coined by Steven Jones.

Drs Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds have NEVER made any specific claims as to where the Star Wars Beam Weapon originated from.

Steven Jones uses "space beam" for the purpose of mind control over the 9/11 "truth movement", in an attempt to discourage them from looking at the evidence.

Here's a quote from page 7 of the Star Wars Beam Weapon paper:

Our critics have accused us of insisting that beam weapons did their damage from outer space, yet we make no claim about whether the directed energy weapon operated from a space-, air-, or ground-based platform. Nor do we make any claim about what wavelength(s) was used, what the source(s) of energy was, whether it involved interference of multiple beams, whether it involved sound waves, whether it involved sonoluminescence, whether it involved antimatter weapons, whether it involved scalar weapons, whether it was HAARP (more here and here), whether it involved a nuclear process (e.g. NDEW, more info), whether it involved conventional directed energy weapons (cDEW), whether it involved improvised directed energy weapons (iDEW), nor what kind of accelerator was used, nor do we claim to know what the serial numbers of the parts that were in the weapon(s).

What we do claim is that the evidence is consistent with the use of high-energy weapons that go well beyond the capabilities of conventional explosives and can be directed.

In August 2006, we began looking at the bathtub which protected the WTC and it led us to look at more data. The data told us what destroyed the twin towers. The data told us that directed-energy weapons must exist. We were not aware that the US military had directed-energy weapons. After we concluded that some sort of energy weapon was used, we looked for evidence that such weapons exist and found it, as documented here. Developers and manufacturers of DEWs are listed here, along with some examples of their product line, which is available in the public domain. As Sherlock Holmes declared,

"When you have eliminated all which is impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth."

=======================
=======================

Steven Jones uses term "space beam":

The current "pet theory" that I have challenged is one now supported by you and (not surprisingly) Wood and Reynolds - the idea that "space beams" or "energy beams" were directed at the Towers to bring them down.

LINK

=======================

Of late, [Jim Fetzer] refers often to his association now with Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds. These two are noted for their no-planes-hit-the-Towers theories and for promoting the notion of ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers.

I join Kevin Ryan and many others in withdrawing from the group so that my name will not be attached to the personalized attacks and ray-beams-from-space stuff on www.st911.org.

We won’t spend much time on ray-beams from space knocking down the Towers!

I support this statement made recently by Dr. Frank Legge, Kevin Ryan, Victoria Ashley, and other (previous) members of the Scholars for 9/11 Truth: "...As of this date the web site continues to promote assertions which [are] unsupported by the evidence (ray-beams from space caused the demolitions, mini-nukes were used in the WTC towers, real commercial jets did not hit the WTC towers, etc.)...."

LINK

=======================

Dane Alexander Floum (close associate of Steven Jones & administrator at government-front website 911Blogger.com (as GeorgeWashington)) uses term "space beam":

Such people claim that "space beams" destroyed the World Trade Center, that no planes hit the Twin Towers, and that the Twin Towers fell faster than free-fall speed.

LINK

=======================

Jim Fetzer says Steven Jones uses space beam term:

Although [Judy Wood] did not commit herself to that specific hypothesis, she also suggested that directed energy could have come from above, such as from a space-based satellite using a mirror to direct energy. That has led to a veritable propaganda blitz attacking us both for considering "space beam"weaponry!

Judy’s use of "star wars" was a subtle intimation of its probable origins, but Steve has used "space beams" in order to denigrate it!

LINK

[emphasis added in all quotes above]

=======================
=======================

Shout it out

Digg Story

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
CB_Brooklyn's picture

New Interview with Judy Wood

Excellent show. Click here

Fred's picture

I like the term "Space Beam", actually.

It has a nice ring to it. I guess the public forgot that we do have things called satellites and they do orbit the earth, and even Google shows us pictures of them through Google Earth. Why, it's even possible that the military might have a few satellites of their own!

But then, I suppose lasers and microwaves are just imaginary, George Jetson, Space Age Technology like airplanes, elevators, and computers.

What will those crazy conspiracy theorists want us to believe in next? X-rays? RADAR? Flat screens?

No, space based weapons are just too far-fetched to even consider as a possibility. I wonder how that solar cooker works. Just magical, isn't it. I bet that's how Osama cooks his dinner every night, since he can't have the gas and electric in his own name, can he?

Fred

zark's picture

Connotive

I think the point is that Jones is speaking on behalf of an incomplete investigation using the term 'Space beams' to infer a solid position of argument and connotations of;

sci-fi
television
star trek
geeks
teenagers
...
on and on

Even the Government project "Star Wars" uses the connotations as cover to make the military/gov look silly while the reality is the weapons exist.

Fred's picture

Connotations

Hi Zark,

Your point is well taken and I certainly wasn't mocking CB's article. I'm just frustrated that the American Public is so dumbed-down and brainwashed that they can't even find the Directed Energy Directorate's homepage when you send them a link to it. It's amazing to me that name-calling has apparently convinced many people that our existing technology doesn't exist.

Fred

rick's picture

Sticks and Stones

When the article came out I was one of the first to envision a Martian spacecraft with the beam. I wrote an article about it pointing out how the things we don't know might be what hurt us most. An open mind is learning.

zark's picture

Haarp, Angels and Heaven

"The Invisible Machine" (previously posted video was soo wrong... dunno what i was thinking. sorry. Easy to type in page search for title. Or scroll to 16th bordered box upfrom bottom)

The History Channel – The Invisible Machine

Unravels the mystery of the Bell Island "boom" and in doing so takes a chilling look at the US military's experimentation with electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons - "e-bombs"

"Angels dont play these Haarps"

"Holes in Heaven"

Star Wars just got renamed and given to a new department.

btw, hi fred. I wasnt having a go, just my style of posting.

CB_Brooklyn's picture

zark

thanks for the links!

CB_Brooklyn's picture

Steven Jones "space beam" quotes

see blog for updates!

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.

Sponsor

User login

Subscribe

9/11 Researchers - Open Resource for 9/11 Researchers

Syndicate

Syndicate content

Web Pages referring to this page
Link to this page and get a link back!