Professor Judy Wood, a professor with degrees in Civil Engineering, Engineering mechanics and Materials Engineering Science has filed suit for the United States of America against NIST alleging fraud. The case has been accepted and unsealed by Federal Court in Manhattan, NY.

“NIST was hanging out with the wrong crowd,” Dr. Wood stated. “Apparently the people hired to do the work of figuring out how the Twin Towers disappeared convinced NIST to focus on something else. NIST admitted to me in writing that it deliberately did not investigate the actual unraveling of the WTC.” In a letter dated July 27, 2007, to Dr. Wood NIST acknowledged, “NIST only investigated the factors leading to the initiation of the collapses of the WTC towers, not the collapses themselves.” Which, of course leaves the investigation into why, or how, they actually collapsed for some other generation to discover.

In a previous filing with NIST Dr. Wood got a definitive definition of what “collapse” would be from NIST; “a falling in, loss of shape, or reduction to flattened form or rubble of a structure.” Which leaves the NIST study a fraud, as it never did the job it was paid to do.

Further complications come from the fact that the “experts.” those who did the testing and research for NIST, come from the same sources that would have resources to destroy the towers in NYC. Some of the defendants named are Applied Research Associates (ARA), Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), and Underwriters Laboratories.

The filing claims the corporate and individual defendants committed actionable fraud under the False Claims Act. Her lawsuit seeks reimbursement of monies paid, penalties and interest. "[The] defendants…committed fraud in seeking to have NCSTAR 1 deceive the public into not recognizing that WTC1, 2 could not reasonably or possibly have been destroyed in the manner seen absent the use of DEW. Some of the defendants knew as much; other defendants either knew or if they did not, they should have known. To the extent they did not know, such ignorance was willful, intentional and actionable under the False Claims Act."

Dr. Wood’s lawyer, Jerry Leaphart of Connecticut, has already served notice on NIST of the filing. No dates are set for any actions when this article was written.

“The most shocking claim may be that some of the defendants include those actually involved in development and manufacture of directed energy weapons and the development of covert psychological operations, which Wood claims were key ingredients in the events of 9/11,” Leaphart stated.

The complaint states, in part:

"[The] defendants…committed fraud in seeking to have NCSTAR 1 deceive the public into not recognizing that WTC1, 2 could not reasonably or possibly have been destroyed in the manner seen absent the use of DEW. Some of the defendants knew as much; other defendants either knew or if they did not, they should have known. To the extent they did not know, such ignorance was willful, intentional and actionable under the False Claims Act."

=== Corrections ===

Dr. Judy Wood & Dr. Morgan Reynolds assert claims on behalf of NIST against contractors who allegedly made false claims for money to the Government. See http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html for Judy’s Qui Tam suit, and see www.nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=federal_case and www.nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911&subpage1=supplement_NIST for info on Morgan’s Qui Tam suit (including full copies of the Qui Tam claims).

The U.S. Government (i.e., the U.S. Department of Justice) had an opportunity to prosecute those civil claims against the government contractors, but the government chose not to do so. Therefore, Morgan & Judy are prosecuting the claims on behalf of the U.S. Government. If & when they win, they will get a share of the damages.

Resource: http://drjudywood.com/articles/NIST/Qui_Tam_Wood.html

Shout Story!

DIGG! this article and get the word out!