It was a shame to see the sorry turnout in San Francisco for this march. Dwindling marchers do not mean less people caring about the problems in the nation but maybe less care about the liars in the "911 movement" as they embrace the 9-11 Mysteries fractured fairy tales.

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE… - the Final Holdout: 9/11

Not to worry, this is not about truth seekers or conspiracy theories. It’s not about the long list of anomalies and discrepancies in the official story of 9/11. It’s not even about the undeniable fact that the events of 9/11 gave George Bush and his handlers the keys to the neocon kingdom of empire. It really is not.

Shayler says he's the New Messiah and UK 911 Truth wants to cover up whatever it was he said.

Rising to an occasion to a packed hall David Shayler had a message. The subjects of the queen have censored, just as if it was in her name. Only rude and crude innuendo and assumptions are allowed as the British have decided no one should hear David. Their authority goes unquestioned.

After weeks of vicious slander against me, Webfairy finally retracted her fraudulent accusations against me, and admitted having been in error:

[I made some fundamentally bad assumptions I need to take responsibility for and I need to admit to what amounted to a smear that I kept up with even after my friends tried to warn me.]

[...my hormones remark.... I have to take responsibility for it, and for the posion (sic) that coffin's interpretation added.
http://www.911researchers.com/node/725#comment-5604

And now she's repeating the same lies all over again:

[Even Coffinman has admitted it's un-debunkable]
http://www.911researchers.com/node/743#comment-5894
I reckoned that she had proved her case, but some people here don't.
I haven't been in the debate.
So please forgive me if I do not have a "final answer" on what I think of her work.
Yes I described her once as having "proven" DEW, but that was only my personal opinion.
(And nobody is perfect, are they??!)
If there has been no debate, then the ideas have not been tested critically.
Until her work is discussed it could be a crock of shit.

Picked up from 911 Eyewitness Web Site

"Sophia, Brad and Avatar:
I see you still do not understand there is no license in this world for the corruption of evidence you have made. The complete wanton editing of sound, inserting explosions that you have done not only dilutes real evidence but also has caused confusion in the ranks of people researching truth. Your fictions have fooled too many people. The law does not allow the kind of editing of works you have done.

I had previously spoken out exposing the liars and frauds that abound within the 911truth movement(1) Since doing that it is not strange to find I have won no friends within. When you expose people as liars and frauds they must deny that identification or the game is up – and that will not happen until the fires are at their gate.

Check out the curious references to "special effects" from the Computer Graphics expert and 9/11 scriptwriter himself. Also notice the chronology and the statement that he was not an eyewitness.
Please click here, spread the word!
How many times can you spot the official story elements and talking points in Gary's article?

http://www.vanadia.com/nycstories/911stories/gary_welz/

Gary Welz
NYCstories.com

This is the promised next disinfo passed by Sophia, Brad Waddell, Jim Fetzer, Steven Jones and David Ray Griffin as 911 Truth.

In this latest orgy of lies from the recent Sophia Fetzer interviews the two of them go to moral bankruptcy by agreeing that taking words and moving them around is a good thing. This from a professor emeritus in philosophy puts James Fetzer into a special school.